A Single Center Evaluation of AI Enabled SureForm Robotic Stapler (SureformTM) Compared to Conventional Stapler for Colorectal Cancer Procedures
This is not medical advice. AI-assisted translation — inaccuracies may occur. Always verify the original and consult your oncologist before taking any steps.
About the trial
Robotic-assisted surgeries are especially valuable for colorectal pathologies because they offer better vision and control for surgical manipulation given the narrow operative region within the pelvis .Some of the iatrogenic risk factors associated with higher post-operative adverse events following colorectal surgeries are surgeon experience' and hospital case load'. In order to mitigate these factors, surgical staplers have gained preference amongst surgeons due to their reproducible results and ease of learning At present there are only two methods of creating an anastomosis: hand-sewn technique using sutures or surgical staplers. Surgical staplers have been shown to be as effective as hand-sewn techniques for colorectal anastomoses However, anastomotic strictures can be bothersome for patients and the rate of stricture is fourfold higher for stapled anastomoses than for those that are hand sewn in colorectal anastomoses . Additionally, overzealous or incorrect stapling could also result in hemostasis or ischemia One of the most dreaded adverse events of colorectal resection is anastomotic leakages followed, in decreasing severity, by post-operative bleeding and ileus. Because of the severity of adverse events associated with an anastomotic leak, it is important to detect it early and provide early management for the same. However, diagnosis of anastomotic leakage is commonly a symptomatic diagnosis based on development of gas, purulent or fecal discharge from the drain, purulent discharge from the rectum, pelvic abscess or peritonitis. Such severe symptoms further complicate the post-operative recovery and lengthen the hospital stay. Interestingly, it has been reported that anastomotic leaks were more often diagnosed late in the postoperative period and more often after hospital discharge, or 12 days postoperatively . Anastomotic leakage rates vary from the colon to the rectum, with much higher rates in the rectum. Because of the severity of adverse events associate with an anastomotic leak, there is a pressing need for new techniques for prevention of anastomotic leakages .
Original English text from ClinicalTrials.gov
Who can (and can't) join
✓ Qualifies
- •Wiek 18-85 lat
- •Planowana operacja robotyczna lub laparoskopowa (przezpoziomowa) z powodu raka jelita grubego bez przerzutów
- •Zastosowanie zszywaczy do cięcia tkanek lub łączenia jelit
✗ Disqualifies
- •Operacja pilna/natychmiastowa
- •Leczenie nawrotowego raka jelita grubego
- •Zaawansowany rak wymagający rozległych zabiegów dodatkowych
- •Rak przebijający wszystkie warstwy ścianki jelita (T4b)
- •Jednoczesne duże operacje brzucha lub miednicy
Simplified criteria — AI translation
Trial details
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 85 Years
- Last updated (source)
- October 8, 2026
- Sex
- No restrictions
Therapies / drugs in trial
Locations (1)
AIG Hospitals
Hyderabad, India
Trial contact
DR G V RAO, MBBS,MAMS,FRCS
Contact information from ClinicalTrials.gov. Contact in English.
Share this trial
Data from ClinicalTrials.gov. AI-assisted translation, last sync: 10/9/2026.
You can help another person
We fund the Radar, this site, and the development of our Grosz dla Życia fundraising platform from donations and our own resources. Every contribution, even a small one, really helps.