Clinical Trials Radar

Single-center, non-commercial phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate 177Lu-PSMA as a systemic adjuvant treatment in patients with high and very high risk prostate cancer after radical treatment using locoregional teleradiotherapy and hormone therapy

REGYNERA(dia)TION is an international, multicenter, ambispective observational patient registry of adults with recurrent gynecologic malignancies after prior radiotherapy who are treated or planned for reirradiation and/or total ablative strategies as part of routine clinical care. The registry does not assign treatment. Radiotherapy technique, dose, systemic therapy, surgery, metastasis-directed therapy, imaging, and follow-up are selected by the treating multidisciplinary team according to local standards and patient-specific factors. The registry will collect harmonized retrospective and prospective data on disease characteristics, prior radiotherapy, recurrence pattern, reirradiation or ablative treatment exposure, response, progression, survival, severe treatment-related morbidity, fistula events, and patient-reported outcomes where available.

In this phase III study, the primary objective is to test with a one-sided significance of 5% whether for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients, brain MRI surveillance alone is non-inferior in terms of overall survival compared to prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) combined with brain MRI surveillance in the entire study population.

The primary objective of this study is to measure efficacy of saruparib + physician's choice of ARPI compared with placebo + ARPI in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) who have previously received docetaxel chemotherapy or a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed lutetium-177 radioligand therapy with no evidence of disease progression and PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL.

Brain tumors account for 1.35% of all cancers and cause 2.2% of cancer-related deaths. Gliomas are the most common type, comprising 40-90% of central nervous system tumors in different age groups. The incidence of malignant gliomas is approximately 0.5-2 per 100,000 people annually. Standard treatments include surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, yet overall survival remains low, typically 1-3 years post-diagnosis. The study highlights the pressing need for novel treatment strategies, particularly given the infiltrative nature of gliomas and the potential for targeted therapies using neuropeptides. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of local targeted therapy with \[225Ac\]Ac-DOTA-SP in recurrent glioblastoma. It is an interventional study without a control group, initiated by the researcher. Patients included are aged 18-80 with recurrent WHO G3-G4 glioma post-first-line treatment, not requiring immediate surgery and meeting specific MRI progression criteria. Patients will receive a maximum of six cycles of \[225Ac\]Ac-DOTA-SP, involving pre-treatment assessments, local administration of the agent after ensuring catheter patency, and continuous monitoring. Blood tests and neurological evaluations will be performed regularly. Outcome will be assessed by measuring overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The study anticipates improvements in both OS and PFS when compared to current treatments, contributing to critical insights into targeted alpha therapy's effectiveness in glioblastoma. Treatment with \[225Ac\]Ac-DOTA-SP previously indicated few significant side effects, primarily transient issues like seizures. Patients will be closely monitored throughout the study to identify any adverse effects promptly. The estimated study duration is three years, with biological material collected for histopathological and genetic analysis during surgical reoperation. Data will be anonymized to protect patient confidentiality, stored securely, and made available only for the scope of the study. Led by Prof. Przemysław Kunert, the research team includes multiple co-investigators from neurosurgery and nuclear medicine departments.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of zipalertinib versus placebo in participants with early stage resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRmt).

This study is open to adults with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. The purpose of this study is to find out how well people with this type of cancer tolerate taking study medicines called obrixtamig and pumitamig. Another purpose is to check whether the combination study treatment can make tumours shrink. Obrixtamig and pumitamig are being developed to help the immune system fight cancer. Participants are put into 2 groups. One group gets obrixtamig and pumitamig. The other group gets obrixtamig and pumitamig with standard chemotherapy (carboplatin and etoposide). All study treatments are given as infusions into a vein. This study does not have a fixed duration. Participants can receive obrixtamig and pumitamig for up to 2 years if they benefit from treatment and can tolerate it. Participants visit the study site regularly, with some overnight stays required. During this time, doctors regularly check for health problems that could be caused by the study treatment. They also monitor the size of the tumour(s) and take laboratory tests.

The purpose of this study is to measure the efficacy and safety of R-mini-CHOP × 2 followed by AZD0486 compared with R-mini-CHOP × 6 in elderly or unfit participants newly diagnosed with LBCL.

The study is for patients with advanced melanoma who are eligible for standard therapy with Pembrolizumab.

Study ASTX030-01 is a multi-phase study comprising of Phases 1-3 Monotherapy arms, and Phase 1 and Phase 2 Combination Therapy arms. Phase 1 Monotherapy consists of an open-label Dose Escalation Stage (Stage A) using multiple cohorts at escalating dose levels of oral cedazuridine and azacitidine (only one study drug will be escalated at a time) followed by a Dose Expansion Stage (Stage B). Phase 2 Monotherapy is a randomized, open-label, crossover study to compare oral ASTX030 to subcutaneous (SC) azacitidine. Phase 3 Monotherapy is a randomized open-label crossover study comparing the final fixed dose of oral ASTX030 to SC azacitidine. Phase 1 Combination Therapy is an open-label, multicenter, randomized, exploratory study comparing ASTX030 and SC azacitidine in combination with venetoclax in participants with treatment-naïve AML. Phase 2 Combination Therapy is an open-label, single arm, study evaluating the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and drug interactions of ASTX030 in combination with venetoclax in participants with treatment-naïve AML. The duration of this multi-phase study is approximately 8 years.

This is a multi-center, open-label study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-cancer activity of oral administration of emavusertib alone or in combination with ibrutinib in adult participants with relapsed or refractory (R/R) hematologic malignancies. This trial will be completed in four parts. In Part A1, emavusertib will be evaluated first in a dose escalating monotherapy setting to establish the safety and tolerability (complete). In Part A2, emavusertib will be evaluated in combination with ibrutinib at 560 milligrams (mg) once daily (QD) or 420 mg QD as indicated by disease (Part A2 complete). Part B will comprise 2 cohorts to assess safety and efficacy of emavusertib in combination with ibrutinib in participants with R/R primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) who have directly progressed on a bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi). In this part of the study, emavusertib will be dosed at 100 mg or 200 mg twice daily (BID) in combination with ibrutinib in 28-day treatment cycles. Part C will comprise 3 treatment arms in the second-line setting to assess the efficacy and safety of emavusertib monotherapy, ibrutinib monotherapy, and emavusertib in combination with ibrutinib in participants with R/R PCNSL who are naïve to BTKi treatment. In this part of the study, eligible second-line participants with R/R PCNSL who are naïve to BTKi treatment will be randomized 1:1:1 to 1 of 3 treatment arms: (1) emavusertib 200 mg BID, (2) ibrutinib 560 mg QD, or (3) emavusertib 200 mg BID in combination with ibrutinib 560 mg QD.

This study, known as LUNAR-2, aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of using TTFields, delivered by the NovoTTF-200T device, concomitantly administered with pembrolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer that has spread to other parts of the body. The primary goals of the study are to assess overall survival and progression-free survival. Secondary objectives include analyzing outcomes based on the specific histology (subtype) of the lung cancer.

Phase 1/2a Clinical Trial of BI-1206, a Monoclonal Antibody to CD32b (FcyRIIB), in Combination with Rituximab with or without Acalabrutinib in Subjects with Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma That has Relapsed or is Refractory to Rituximab

The goal of this randomized, double-blind, multi-regional phase 3 study of cadonilimab combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in combination with or without nivolumab for the first-line treatment of participants with HER2-negative, previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma trial is to compare OS between cadonilimab combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy in combination with or without nivolumab in the ITT population.

The aim of the study is to test the effect of tDCS stimulation on upper and lower limb function in neurological patients and to reduce pain in gynaecological patients. And the impact of tDCS stimulation on patients' quality of life. Standardised questionnaires will be used for pre- and post-stimulation evaluation.

Metastatic colorectal cancer or mCRC is a cancer that starts in the parts of the large intestine (the colon or rectum) and has already spread to other parts of the body. This cancer can be hard to treat because it can behave differently from one person to another. Over time, treatments may stop working, and side effects can build up. In later treatment stages, there are only a few standard medicine options available. Because of this, studies often look at both how long people live and how treatment affects quality of life. The main aim of this study is to see how long adults in Poland with mCRC live without their cancer getting worse (progression-free survival or PFS) when they receive fruquintinib after at least two previous treatments. Fruquintinib (TAK 113) is a medicine taken by mouth that is designed to slow tumor growth. Other aim is to find out how long adults in Poland with mCRC live while being treated with fruquintinib (overall survival or OS). The study also wants to record how fruquintinib is used in routine care in adults with mCRC in Poland (for example when treatment starts, changes in doses, and how long treatment continues). Another aim is to learn about people with mCRC, such as their medical history and past treatment as well as their quality of life while they are in the study. The study will look at data already existing in the participants' medical charts.

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the most effective dose of EIK1005 that a person can take safely. Additionally, this study will test how well EIK1005 is tolerated alone and in combination with pembrolizumab in treating patients with advanced cancer.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Navlimetostat (BMS-986504) monotherapy or in combination with Izalontamab Brengitecan in participants with advanced or metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with homozygous MTAP deletion or MTAP loss after progression on prior therapies.

This is a phase Ib/II, multicenter, open-label study of YL201 combined with atezolizumab. The study will include 2 parts. Part 1 of the study is a dose escalation in participants with previously untreated ES-SCLC to determine the safety and tolerability of YL201 in combination with fixed dose of atezolizumab. The planned dose levels of YL201 are 1.2 mg/kg, 1.6 mg/kg and 2.0 mg/kg. Part 2 consists of a dose optimization stage followed by a dose expansion stage. During the dose optimization stage, participants will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive either YL201 at 1.2 mg/kg,1.6 mg/kg or 2.0 mg/kg Q3W in combination with fixed dose of atezolizumab. The decision to initiate the dose expansion stage in Part 2 and choose one or two of the YL201 dose level(s) will be based on the review of safety, PK, and efficacy from the dose optimization stage. Treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdraw of consent.

Researchers are looking for a better way to treat people with advanced colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer (cancer of the colon or rectum) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Treatments include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy; however, these treatments do not work for everyone, may cause serious adverse events or may stop working eventually. New treatments and treatment combinations are needed, especially for cancers that cannot be removed with surgery or that have spread to other parts of the body (called advanced or metastatic cancer). Cells normally repair themselves when mistakes happen as they divide. But in some people with cancer, the repair system does not work properly because of a problem called dMMR (deficient mismatch repair). As a result, mistakes build up in the cell's DNA, leading to a condition called MSI (microsatellite instability). Over time, these changes can cause cells to grow and behave abnormally, contributing to the development and growth of cancer. To survive, some cancer cells with dMMR or MSI rely on a protein called Werner helicase. This protein helps repair some of the DNA damage allowing them to keep growing. Because these cancer cells depend more on Werner helicase than healthy cells, blocking this protein may help stop cancer cells from surviving while having less effect on healthy cells. The study drug, VVD-133214, is designed to block the Werner helicase protein. Blocking this protein may help stop cancer cells from growing, while causing less harm to healthy cells. VVD-133214 is being studied in combination with pembrolizumab, an approved immunotherapy that helps the immune system recognize and attack cancer cells. This study will test the combination of VVD-133214 and pembrolizumab in people with advanced colorectal cancer with MSI and/or dMMR who have not yet received treatment for their advanced disease. The study aims to find the best dose of VVD-133214 in combination with pembrolizumab and to test whether the combination is more effective than pembrolizumab alone. Participants will receive treatment with VVD-133214 for as long as it can help them and does not cause serious adverse events. Treatment with pembrolizumab will stop after two years. Participants can also stop treatment at any time. During the study, participants will have regular visits with the study doctor for tests, scans, and check-ups. These visits help check how well the cancer is responding to the treatment and monitor the participants' health. The study will also monitor adverse events, which are any new or worsening medical problems that can happen during the study. Doctors record all adverse events, irrespective of whether the study doctor believes they are related to the study treatments, to help ensure participants' safety throughout the study. After stopping treatment, participants will return for follow-up visits: 30 days after their last dose of VVD-133214 and/or 100 days after their last dose of pembrolizumab. After that, participants will have long-term follow-up visits every 90 days for as long as they agree to continue participating in follow-up.

Study comparing efficacy and safety of olverembatinib (investigational arm) vs. bosutinib (control arm) in patients with CML-CP (Part A). Study will also evaluate efficacy and safety of olverembatinib (single-arm) in CML-CP patients with T315I mutation (Part B). Patients who meet ELN 2025 failure criteria while receiving bosutinib in Part A may be able to receive olverembatinib in crossover follow-on study.

The goal of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of RVU120 when administered in combination with venetoclax to adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are relapsed or refractory to prior therapy with venetoclax and a hypomethylating agent. The study consists of three parts. Part 1 aims to identify the doses of RVU120 and venetoclax that are considered to be safe and tolerated. Part 2 will assess the safety and efficacy of the doses selected. And Part 3 is a confirmatory cohort where patients will be treated at the same doses assessed in Part 2

The goal of the study is to assess the safety and anti-lymphoma activity of MEN1703 (Dapolsertib hydrochloride) when given as a single-agent or combined with glofitamab to patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The study will be open to groups at the same time: * Group 1 - patients who have not had anti-CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody therapy but who have had at least 2 prior lines of systemic treatment for aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma * Group 2 - patients who have exhausted all standard treatment options including at least 2 prior lines of systemic treatment for aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma Group 1 patients will be treated for a maximum of 12 cycles. One cycle is 21 days. Group 2 with be treated until the disease progresses, therefore treatment duration is dependent on the number of treatment cycles a participant receives prior to progression.

The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BL-M14D1 in combination with Atezolizumab compared to Standard-of-Care Therapy in adult participants with previously untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

This is a Phase Ⅲ, randomized, open-label, Sponsor-blinded, 3-arm, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig in combination with fluoropyrimidine and T-DXd (Arm A) compared to trastuzumab, chemotherapy, and pembrolizumab (Arm B) in HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma participants whose tumors express PD L1 CPS ≥ 1. Rilvegostomig in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy will be evaluated in a separate arm (Arm C) to assess the contribution of each component in the experimental arm.