BMS-986489 (Atigotatug + Nivolumab) vs Durvalumab in Limited-stage Small-cell Lung Cancer (TIGOS-LS)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Navlimetostat (BMS-986504) monotherapy or in combination with Izalontamab Brengitecan in participants with advanced or metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with homozygous MTAP deletion or MTAP loss after progression on prior therapies.

This is a phase Ib/II, multicenter, open-label study of YL201 combined with atezolizumab. The study will include 2 parts. Part 1 of the study is a dose escalation in participants with previously untreated ES-SCLC to determine the safety and tolerability of YL201 in combination with fixed dose of atezolizumab. The planned dose levels of YL201 are 1.2 mg/kg, 1.6 mg/kg and 2.0 mg/kg. Part 2 consists of a dose optimization stage followed by a dose expansion stage. During the dose optimization stage, participants will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive either YL201 at 1.2 mg/kg,1.6 mg/kg or 2.0 mg/kg Q3W in combination with fixed dose of atezolizumab. The decision to initiate the dose expansion stage in Part 2 and choose one or two of the YL201 dose level(s) will be based on the review of safety, PK, and efficacy from the dose optimization stage. Treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdraw of consent.

The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BL-M14D1 in combination with Atezolizumab compared to Standard-of-Care Therapy in adult participants with previously untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

This is a study evaluating the efficacy and safety of calderasib with pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in participants with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with identified Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog G12C (KRAS G12C) mutation and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%. There are two primary study hypotheses: Hypothesis 1: Combination of calderasib and pembrolizumab is superior to placebo plus pembrolizumab with respect to progression free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Hypothesis 2: Combination of calderasib plus pembrolizumab is superior to placebo plus pembrolizumab with respect to overall survival (OS).