Clinical Trials Radar

Building upon the results from the CCCG-ALL-2015, CCCG-ALL-2020 multicenter study cohort, concurrent research findings, and the latest clinical trials, the CCCG-ALL-2025 I/HR-B-ALL is thus developed to further improve the event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QoL) of children with intermediate- and high- risk B-cell childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (I/HR-B-ALL), while decreasing adverse reactions and transplantation rates. This trial primarily aims to explore: 1. The efficacy of two randomized Blinatumomab application scheme on I/HR-ALL as determined by MRD negatvitiy rate. 2. The efficacy of modified mini-hyperCVD + Venetoclax in I/HR-ALL cannot afford blinatumomab, in contrast to historical control as determined by MRD negatvitiy rate.

Study consists of two main parts to explore BGB-16673 recommended dosing, a Phase 1 monotherapy dose finding comprised of monotherapy dose escalation and monotherapy safety expansion of selected doses, and a Phase 2 (expansion cohorts)

The goal of this clinical trial is to adapt, implement, and evaluate MyCarePulse and ASCENT patient navigator to overcome barriers to care among patients with cancer. The main hypotheses it aims to test are: * At the patient level, the intervention will result in higher levels of food security, self- efficacy for dietary behaviors, and higher diet quality than standard care. * At the provider level, the intervention will be feasible, acceptable, appropriate, and able to enhance individualized care for patient wellness. Researchers will compare cancer patients receiving the MyCarePulse and ASCENT patient navigator intervention to those receiving standard care, to see if the intervention improves food security, self-efficacy, and diet quality. Phase 1 Patient Participants will: * Complete the ASCENT Questionnaire, which is comprised of the following: * U.S. Food Security Survey Module (U.S. FSSM) * Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) * General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) * Complete the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour (ASA24®) Dietary Assessment Tool a total of 4 times. * Be assessed using the Veggie Meter instrument * Participate in two semi-structured interviews Provider Participants will: •Participate in one semi-structured interview Phase 2 Patient Participants will: * Participate in ASCENT patient navigator screenings and consultations * Complete the ASCENT Questionnaire, which comprises the U.S. FSSM, PROMIS-29, and ASA24®

This is a Phase I/II study evaluating safety and efficacy of proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib) in combination with CPX-351 (liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine) for the treatment of newly-diagnosed TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (TP53m AML). The primary endpoint of the study is to define safety/tolerability (phase I) and preliminary efficacy profile (phase II) of the treatment. The secondary endpoints of interest are complete remission (CR) rate, detectable minimal residual disease (MRD) status, overall response rate (ORR), rate of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), treatment-related mortality (TRM), overall survival (OS), achievement of complete remission anytime in 1 year, and disease-free survival (DFS) at 1 year and 2 years. All the patient outcomes assessments will be performed as part of standard-of-care AML management. The hypothesis is the combination of bortezomib and CPX-351 will have an acceptable safety profile in this patient population based on the data from previous studies. The treatment will attenuate Nuclear Factor kB pathway activation in these cells and eradicate TP53m leukemia stem cells (LSC) leading to increased response rate and survival in these patients.

This trial will look at a drug called SEA-CD70 with and without azacitidine, to find out if it is safe for participants with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). It will study SEA-CD70 to find out what its side effects are and if it works for AML and MDS. A side effect is anything the drug does besides treating cancer. This study will have seven groups or "parts." * Part A will find out how much SEA-CD70 should be given to participants * Part B will use the dose found in Part A to find out how safe SEA-CD70 is and if it works to treat participants with MDS. * Part C will use the dose found in Part A to find out how safe SEA-CD70 is and if it works to treat participants with AML. * Part D will find out how much SEA-CD70 with azacitidine should be given to participants * Part E will use the dose found in Part D to find out how safe SEA-CD70 with azacitidine is and if it works to treat participants with MDS or MDS/AML that has not been treated. * Part F will use the dose found in Part D to find out how safe SEA-CD70 with azacitidine is and if it works to treat participants with MDS or MDS/AML. * Part G will find out how much SEA-CD70 with azacitidine and with venetoclax should be given to participants with AML. Also, to evaluate safety and tolerability of PF-08046040 in combination with azacitidine and venetoclax in participants with previously untreated AML who are unfit for standard induction chemotherapy.

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability and to confirm the dose of nemtabrutinib in combination with venetoclax in participants with R/R CLL/SLL. The primary study hypotheses are that the combination of nemtabrutinib plus venetoclax is superior to VR with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) per 2018 International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) criteria as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR).

This phase II trial studies how well giving an umbilical cord blood transplant together with cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, and total-body irradiation (TBI) works in treating patients with hematologic diseases. Giving chemotherapy, such as cyclophosphamide, fludarabine and thiotepa, and TBI before a donor cord blood transplant (CBT) helps stop the growth of cancer and abnormal cells and helps stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. When the healthy stem cells from a donor are infused into the patient they may help the patient's bone marrow make stem cells, red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can make an immune response against the body's normal cells. Giving cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil after transplant may stop this from happening in patients with high-risk hematologic diseases.

This is a phase II, open-label, multi-center study evaluating the efficacy and safety of sonrotoclax (SA) in combination with azacitidine (AZA) plus individualized targeted or chemotherapeutic agents in adult participants with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Eligible participants will be stratified into different treatment arms based on genetic background (FLT3/IDH1 mutation status) and fitness for intensive chemotherapy. All participants will receive sonrotoclax with dose escalation from 20 mg/day to 320 mg/day, followed by maintenance dosing, which may be temporarily held by the investigator from Day 14 to Day 28 of each 28-day cycle based on the participant's condition, combined with azacitidine 75 mg/m²/day intravenously on Days 1-7. For participants fit for intensive chemotherapy, additional anthracycline (daunorubicin 60 mg/m²/day or idarubicin 10 mg/m²/day on Days 1-3) will be administered. For participants with FLT3 mutations, gilteritinib 80 mg once daily on Days 1-14 will be added; for those with IDH1 mutations, ivosidenib 500 mg once daily on Days 1-28 will be added.

This is a Phase I/II study designed to evaluate if experimental T cell engaging antibody targeting CD20 AZD5492 is safe, tolerable and efficacious in participants with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Malignancies.

The objective of this study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic profile, and preliminary efficacy of BL-M11D1 in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) are blood cancers that affect certain white blood cells. Advanced forms of these diseases are difficult to treat. Pirtobrutinib is a drug approved to treat CLL and SLL after 2 previous treatments. Researchers want to know how this drug affects the immune system in those who have not yet started other treatments for CLL or SLL. Objective: To test pirtobrutinib as a first-line treatment for CLL or SLL. Eligibility: People aged 18 years and older with untreated CLL or SLL. Design: Participants will be screened. They will have a physical exam with blood tests. They will have imaging scans and tests of their heart function. They will have a lymph node biopsy: A large needle will be inserted into a lymph node to collect a small piece of tissue. Pirtobrutinib is a tablet taken by mouth. Participants will take 2 to 4 tablets daily in 4-week cycles. Participants will have clinic visits once every 4 weeks for the first 3 months. Then they will be seen once every 3 months. Imaging scans, lymph node biopsy, and other tests will be repeated at various study visits. A bone marrow biopsy (collection of soft tissue from inside a bone) may be done if there is no evidence of disease after 1 year of treatment with the study drug. Participants may opt to have cancer and immune cells collected from their blood. The cells will be used for research. Participants will have a clinic visit 1 month after their last dose of the study drug. Then they will have follow-up visits or phone calls every 6 to 12 months....

Chemokine receptor CXCR4 is normally expressed on T-lymphocytes, B-lymphocytes, monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils and eosinophils as well as hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) in the bone marrow. 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT represents a promising method for the in vivo assessment of the CXCR4 expression status in cancer patients, especially in hematologic malignancies. This prospective study is going to investigate whether metabolic characterization by 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT may be superior for diagnosis, risk stratification, and the prognostic evaluation in lymphoproliferative diseases.

The purpose of this study is to determine the proportion of participants who achieve undetectable measurable residual disease (uMRD) in previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL).

Protocol Title: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study of Venetoclax Plus 3-Day Decitabine (DEC3-VEN) Versus Venetoclax Plus "2+6" DA Versus "3+7" DA Regimen in Adult Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Objective: This is a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase II trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of three induction regimens-Venetoclax plus 3-day Decitabine (DEC3-VEN), Venetoclax plus "2+6" DA, and standard "3+7" DA-in adult patients with newly diagnosed, intensifiable AML. Study Design: The study employs a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter design. A total of 291 eligible patients will be enrolled across approximately 10 centers in China and randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to the three treatment arms. Key Eligibility Criteria: Inclusion: Aged 16-65 with newly diagnosed non-APL AML (excluding favorable CBF-AML), eligible for intensive chemotherapy, ECOG ≤2, and adequate organ function. Exclusion: Prior AML treatment, secondary AML, active severe infection, significant cardiac comorbidity, or known hypersensitivity to the study drugs. Interventions: Induction: Arm A (VEN+"2+6"DA): Venetoclax (D1-8), Daunorubicin (D2-3), Cytarabine (D2-7). Arm B (DEC3-VEN): Venetoclax (D1-14), Decitabine (D4-6). FLT3/ITD+ patients add Sorafenib or Gilteritinib (D8-14). Arm C ("3+7"DA): Daunorubicin (D1-3), Cytarabine (D1-7). Consolidation (2 cycles): Arms A/B: Venetoclax + Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine. Arm C: High-Dose Cytarabine. Consolidation (Subsequent cycles): All arms receive multiple cycles of DA or HA regimens. Maintenance (6-8 cycles): Arms A/B: Venetoclax + Azacitidine. Arm C: Azacitidine. Main Outcome Measures: Primary Endpoint: Composite Complete Remission Rate (CR + CRi) after induction. Secondary Endpoints: Overall Survival (OS), CR rate, MRD-negative rate, Relapse-Free Survival (RFS), Event-Free Survival (EFS), and safety. Keywords: Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Venetoclax, Decitabine, Consolidation Therapy, Maintenance Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trial.

This phase II trial tests the safety, side effects, and how well combination chemotherapy with fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and idarubicin (FLAG-Ida) followed immediately by reduced-intensity total body radiation therapy, called total body irradiation (TBI), and donor hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) works in treating adults age 60 and older with newly diagnosed adverse-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or other high-grade myeloid cancer. Despite advances in supportive care and the approval of more than 10 new drugs since 2017, the outcomes of older adults with adverse-risk acute myeloid leukemia and other high-grade myeloid cancers remains poor. Most patients are expected to die from their cancer or the consequences of treatment-related side effects. Donor HCT is a very important part of any curative-cancer treatment for these patients. However, while accepted as standard care for decades, this treatment exposes patients to long periods of drug-induced low blood cell counts and the problems associated with low blood counts, like infections and bleeding, which are associated with significant risk of chronic side effects and death. This study will use a different approach to the upfront curative-cancer treatment of older adults with an adverse-risk AML or other high-grade myeloid cancer. This study will use intense chemotherapy followed a few days later by lower-dose TBI and donor HCT. Chemotherapy drugs, such as idarubicin, fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. G-CSF helps the bone marrow make more white blood cells in patients with low white blood cell count due to cancer treatment. This approach allows effective treatment of cancer cells and overall reduction of the period of low blood cells counts. This decreases the risk for problems associated with low blood counts, such as infection and chronic side effects. Decreasing these are important for older adults who undergo HCT. This treatment strategy may improve treatment outcomes by allowing more patients to successfully undergo donor HCT and reduce the risk of low blood cell counts and the problems associated with low blood counts. Giving chemotherapy followed immediately by reduced-intensity TBI and donor HCT may be safe, tolerable and/or effective in treating adults age 60 and older with newly diagnosed adverse-risk AML or other high-grade myeloid cancer.

The purpose of this study is to test the safest and most effective dose of a new investigational drug, rebecsinib. Participants in this study will have either Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia (sAML) that has either returned (relapsed) or not responded to treatment (refractory) or have higher risk Myelofibrosis (MF). Participants will receive a study drug infusion on Day 1, Day 4, Day 8 and Day 11 of each 28-day cycle for a total of 6 cycles.

Background: Most people with hairy cell leukemia have a BRAF gene mutation. They can be treated with BRAF inhibitors, drugs that target this mutation. For people who do not have this mutation, BRAF inhibitors are not a treatment option. We found that in hairy cell leukemia, when BRAF is not mutated, the MEK gene frequently is. Binimetinib is a MEK inhibitor which targets MEK. It is important to determine if this drug can be a good treatment option in those who cannot benefit treatment with BRAF inhibitors. Objective: To see if binimetinib is an effective treatment for hairy cell leukemia that does not have a BRAF mutation. Eligibility: People ages 18 and older with hairy cell leukemia without a mutation in the BRAF gene and whose disease either did not respond to treatment or came back after treatment Design: Participants will be screened with: * Medical history * Physical exam * Blood and urine tests * Lung and heart tests * Eye exam * Bone marrow biopsy: A needle will be injected through the participant s skin into the bone to remove a sample of marrow. * CT or MRI scan: Participants will lie in a machine that takes pictures of the body. They might receive a contrast agent by vein. Before they start treatment, participants will have an abdominal ultrasound, pulmonary function tests, and exercise stress tests. Participants will take binimetinib by mouth twice daily in 28-day cycles. They will keep a medication diary. Participants will have at least one visit before every cycle. Visits will include repeats of some screening tests. Participants may continue treatment as long as their disease does not get worse and they do not have bad side effects. About a month after their last dose of treatment, participants will have a follow-up visit. They will then have visits once a year....

The goal of this observational study is to study the effectiveness and complications of novel immunotherapies used in the treatment of multiple myeloma in routine care in Norway. The aim is to close knowledge gaps, generate evidence for future clinical trials and contribute to future consensus on how to monitor for adverse events, and what mitigation strategies should be implemented, so that we can increase patient survival and quality-of-life.

This CML disease registry (ASC4REAL-2) aims to gather evidence on the tolerability, safety, effectiveness, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in real-world healthcare from patients with Ph+-CML-CP treated with TKIs approved for 1L and 2L, including prospective follow-up for 5 years identifying and describing long-term treatment outcomes.

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of surovatamig (formerly AZD0486) administered as monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agents in participants with hematological malignancies

Multi-center, open-label, single arm study of asciminib in participants aged ≥1 year to ≤30 years old with r/r Ph+ or ABL-class Ph-like ALL. This study will have 2 parts: Part 1 dose escalation and Part 2 dose expansion. Part 1 dose escalation will enroll participants aged ≥1 year to ≤30 years to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of asciminib when administered with low intensity chemotherapy. Part 2 dose expansion will enroll participants aged ≥1 year to ≤30 years to evaluate safety, tolerability, and efficacy of asciminib at the RP2D with the treatment regimen.

This is a study comparing 3 years of retrospective data (pre-implementation) to 2 years of prospective data after the implementation of a pediatric version of Electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage (pediatric eCART), a clinical decision support (CDS) tool that uses electronic health records (EHR) to identify patients with high risk for life threatening outcomes. Up to 30,000 encounters with pediatric patients will be assessed. Acceptability of the pediatric eCART intervention will also be measured from pediatric nurse clinicians.

The goal of this clinical study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GT801 injection in adult patients with relapsed/refractory CD19-positive B-cell hematologic malignancies and autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Interim analysis conducted when 2 patients complete primary endpoint measurement.

The purpose of this study is to understand the safety, tolerability, efficacy, pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and preliminary efficacy of orally administered AZD3632 in participants with advanced haematologic malignancies with KMT2Ar, NPM1m, or other genotypes associated with homeobox (HOX) overexpression.

This open label, multicenter phase II/III study with multiple randomization phases at differents stages of AML treatment (induction, consolidation and HSCT where applicable) is designed to improve OS in younger (18 to 60 year-old) patients, with AML risk-adapted patient strategies. Within the intermediate risk AML group, optimal GvHD prophylaxis following allogeneic SCT in first CR, after either myeloablative (MAC) or reduced intensity (RIC) conditioning, will also be evaluated. With an adaptative design, this clinical trial could test up to 3 novel AML agents of interest.