This phase II trial tests how well bright white light (BWL) therapy works in reducing cancer-related fatigue and depression in patients with prostate cancer that may have spread from where it first started to nearby tissue, lymph nodes, or distant parts of the body (advanced) and who are undergoing treatment with antiandrogen therapy (ADT) combination therapy. Combination treatment including ADT plus chemotherapy and androgen receptor (AR) targeted therapy or ADT plus AR targeted therapies work by reducing testosterone. Most prostate tumor cells rely on testosterone to help them grow; therefore, ADT combination therapy causes prostate tumor cells to die or to grow more slowly leading to improved overall survival in men with advanced prostate cancer when compared with ADT alone. However, lower levels of testosterone is also commonly associated with worsening fatigue and depression. If prolonged and severe, these complications can alter patient treatment plans, impacting not just quality of life, but leading to inadequate cancer control. BWL therapy is a type of phototherapy that utilizes bright white full-spectrum light, either through a light box or light therapy glasses to help regulate circadian rhythms. Circadian rhythms are physical, mental, and behavioral changes that follow a 24-hour cycle, including the sleep-wake cycle which can become disrupted in cancer patients undergoing treatment, leading to increased fatigue. Additionally, exposure to bright light may increase the production of serotonin, a neurotransmitter that is associated with mood regulation. BWL therapy with AYOpro light therapy glasses may serve as a supportive care measure for men with advanced prostate to help reduce fatigue, as well as improve mood and overall quality of life during ADT combination therapy to maintain cancer care without suffering complications of therapy.
Clinical Trials Radar
Below you will find currently recruiting clinical trials for cancer patients - one click lets you show only trials conducted in Poland. The list is automatically updated from the ClinicalTrials.gov database, and we translate descriptions into Polish.
This is not medical advice - consult your oncologist
Descriptions are automatically translated with AI assistance. Always verify details in the original on ClinicalTrials.gov and consult your treating physician.
Found 4892 of 4862 trials— page 23 of 196
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and clinical activity of tislelizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) in combination with SX-682 (a CXCR1/2 inhibitor) in subjects with newly diagnosed and surgically resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
This study is assessing the safety and tolerability of 5-ALA- mediated Porphyrin Metabolite Activation (PoMA) with LIDU ultrasound, in patients who have just been diagnosed with bihemispheric (in both sides of the brain) glioblastoma, sometimes called butterfly glioblastoma, before they complete their standard of care chemotherapy and radiation and after their standard of care chemotherapy and radiation while they are receviing their standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy.
This is a single-arm, phase II study of neoadjuvant combination therapy of Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT), \[Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonist Leuprolide\], androgen receptor (AR)-antagonist Darolutamide and Pembrolizumab in a stratified high-risk localized prostate cancer cohort, followed by adjuvant treatment with Pembrolizumab (12 cycles) post-radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer (localized or locally advanced) (defined as Gleason ≥8, disease stage \>=cT3a, or PSA l \>20 ng/mL) will be risk-stratified at a biopsy using Decipher, a commercial standard-of-care diagnostic assay. Patients satisfying all three criteria of high-risk genomic characteristics listed below as per the Decipher grid results will be enrolled in the study: 1. Decipher Genomic classifier, GC\>0.6 2. AR activity score/AR-output gene signature (ARoS)\>11.0 3. High Luminal B score/ PAM50 subtype signature
This protocol describes development and user testing of an educational shared decision making intervention to help men with prostate cancer who are on active surveillance make decisions with their health care providers about if and when to de-escalate surveillance testing. The project is important because for many patients their cancer does not progress to the point of needed curative treatment or their health status changes such that they are no longer good candidates for treatment. For these men, de-escalating ongoing surveillance (e.g., fewer biopsies or imaging studies) is a reasonable option.
This multicenter prospective observational registry will evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of adults with local complications of acute pancreatitis or postoperative pancreatic fistula. Data generated during routine clinical care, including patient characteristics, imaging findings, treatments, adverse events, recurrence, and clinical outcomes, will be collected. Treatment is determined by the treating physicians and is not assigned by the study protocol.
The study is designed to assess whether glufosfamide provides additional survival benefit as compared to bolus 5-FU in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have already progressed or failed therapy on a gemcitabine based first line regimen.
Phase 2 Study of Combination Tivozanib and Nivolumab in Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
To learn if giving tivozanib in combination with nivolumab can help to control advanced nccRCC.
This is an open-label phase 1 safety and feasibility study evaluating a novel combination therapy for Diffuse Midline Glioma (DMG), an aggressive brain tumor with a very poor prognosis - an average one-year overall survival. This study combines blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption (BBBD) using low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) and microbubble treatment, and intravenous infusion of autologous, tumor multi-antigen associated specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (TAA-T) therapy. The TAA-T cell investigational product in this protocol is manufactured to target Preferentially Expressed Antigen of Melanoma (PRAME), Wilms Tumor 1 (WT1), and survivin.
STRATHEP develops and validates a multimodal AI model to predict treatment response in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. By integrating digital pathology and MRI radiomics, the project identifies patients likely to benefit from modern systemic therapies, using the RECIST 1.1 framework as the primary benchmark.
Though hepatectomy is one of the curative treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the 5-years recurrence-free survival is lower than 30%. In recent years, several immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved in advanced HCC. However, no study about the safety and efficacy of adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with HCC after hepatectomy was reported.
This is a non-interventional study to prospectively test a suite of predictive biomarker models of immunotherapy resistance in patients with melanoma, non-melanoma skin cancers and other solid tumours. The study will evaluate the documentation, processes, accuracy and utility of the predictive biomarker model in clinical practice.
The purpose of this study is to test whether the combination of fianlimab, cemiplimab, and ipilimumab is a safe and effective treatment that causes few or mild side effects for locally advanced or metastatic, unresectable, refractory melanoma.
In this study researchers propose to do a chart review of all patients that are treated outside of a clinical trial with imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or any other tyrosine kinase inhibitor that becomes FDA approved for the managements of CML that come to MDACC for a second opinion. This is an important population of patients that differs in their management from patients treated in clinical trials for several reasons including but not limited to: 1. It represents a very large patient population receiving standard-dose therapy with TKI. We estimate that we have evaluated over 300 patients that fall in this category. 2. The follow-up for patients in the largest trial using standard-dose imatinib (the IRIS trial, with 553 patients in treated with imatinib) has been limited after the first 12 months. For example, the rate of molecular responses after the first 12 months of therapy was not obtained as samples stopped being collected at that time point. 3. Registration studies for dasatinib and nilotinib have similar limitations with limited follow-up and available information coming only from databases from the sponsors to which there is limited access to investigate dosing, chronic toxicities, second malignancies and other important aspects of therapy. 4. Patients who are or become pregnant during therapy with TKI have not been eligible for clinical trials with TKI or had to be taken off study. Thus, there is no information on the effect of TKI on imatinib on pregnancy and conception. We have followed several such patients at MDACC. 5. This is a patient population that follows therapy mostly as directed by their local oncologists. This is frequently less stringently adhered to the recommended guidelines for TKI therapy, with more frequent treatment interruptions, and frequently using suboptimal doses of imatinib (i.e., less than 300mg daily). The effect of these treatment interruptions and suboptimal dosing on response and development of resistance is unclear. Researchers plan to conduct a chart review of these patients to study their treatment course before their initial evaluation at MDACC, and between and during visits to MDACC.
This is an open-label, multi-cohort, investigator-initiated clinical study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of GI001 in adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R B-NHL) and B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (R/R B-ALL). GI001 is an exploratory, in vivo chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy targeting the CD19 antigen. Unlike traditional CAR-T cell therapies that require extensive in vitro cell manufacturing, GI001 is administered directly to the patient via intravenous infusion, aiming to generate CAR-T cells directly within the patient's body. The study consists of two main phases: * Dose-Escalation Phase: This phase will evaluate four ascending dose levels to assess safety, identify any Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs), determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD), and establish the Recommended Dose for Expansion (RDE). It utilizes an accelerated titration design for the initial doses, followed by a standard "3+3" dose-escalation design. * Dose-Expansion Phase : Once the RDE is identified, additional patients will be enrolled to further evaluate the safety, clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of GI001 at the selected dose(s). The primary focus of the study is to continuously monitor adverse events and evaluate the overall safety profile. Secondary objectives include assessing clinical response rates (such as Objective Response Rate and Complete Response Rate), survival outcomes, and the expansion levels of CAR-T cells in the peripheral blood.
The primary purpose of this study is to gain an understanding of how experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, regardless of COVID-19 status, may have impacted multiple domains of health-related quality of life and other areas such as COVID-19 specific psychological distress, and disruptions to health care, finances and social interactions. We will also evaluate the extent to which resiliency factors such as social support, perceived benefits under times of stress, and ability to manage stress may buffer associations between COVID-19 experiences and HRQoL. To meet these objectives, we have developed a 10-minute questionnaire that taps into these areas and is based on prior work addressing concerns of other pandemics or national crises. Participants will have previously consented to protocol PA15-0336 and have provided prior lifestyle data. This will allow us to connect the COVID-19 survey data with prior existing data.
The goal of this clinical research study is to learn if ONC-PluReceptor NK cell therapy (combined with the monoclonal antibody therapies epcoritamab and tafasitamab) can help to control relapsed or refractory B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. The safety of this treatment will also be studied.
This multicenter study aims to evaluate the predictive value of tumor microenvironment PET/CT imaging for treatment response and prognosis in patients with aggressive lymphoma. Eligible patients with histologically confirmed aggressive lymphoma will undergo FAPI PET/CT imaging, and selected patients who are candidates for immunotherapy will undergo Grazytracer PET/CT imaging. These imaging methods are intended to assess fibroblast activation protein expression and granzyme B activity in lymphoma lesions, reflecting cancer-associated fibroblasts and cytotoxic T-cell activity in the tumor microenvironment. The study will explore optimal imaging assessment criteria and develop clinical-pathological-imaging models to predict treatment response, prognosis, and the relationship between tumor heterogeneity and refractory or relapsed disease.
This is a prospective study to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of Cu-64 DOTA-ECL1i PET/CT imaging to serve as a novel precision imaging tool for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
This trial studies how well dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) works in diagnosing osteoradionecrosis in patients with head and neck cancer that is primary, has come back, or has spread to other places in the body who are undergoing radiation therapy. DCE-MRI may help doctors to predict osteoradionecrosis in patient with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy.
This study aims to evaluate the effect of a structured swallowing rehabilitation program on swallowing function, trismus severity, and pain among patients with head and neck tumors, using a randomized controlled trial design. Eighty patients will be randomly allocated into two equal groups: a study group receiving the swallowing rehabilitation program and a control group receiving standard care.
Chemotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor immunotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), yet patient prognosis remains unsatisfactory, with a median PFS of only about 6 months and a 1-year PFS rate of only 25%. Adding anlotinib maintenance therapy on top of PD-1 inhibitor immunotherapy maintenance after chemoimmunotherapy may improve progression-free survival and overall survival. We plan to conduct a randomized, multicenter, open-label Phase II study of anlotinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor maintenance therapy versus PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy maintenance in advanced ESCC. A total of 112 patients with unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic ESCC are planned to be enrolled. After enrollment, patients will receive either anlotinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor maintenance therapy or PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy maintenance, with a maximum treatment duration of 2 years. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor maintenance therapy in advanced ESCC by comparing it with the PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy maintenance group, further optimizing the comprehensive treatment model for esophageal cancer.
The primary objective is to estimate overall survival after secondary cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for women with recurrent primary mucinous ovarian cancer
The study will be an effectiveness study. The study will include enrollment of a total of 20 patients with at least one PC lesion for ultrasound guided RFA to PC recurrence in the neck to assess the effectiveness in reducing patient's hypercalcemia. Patients will have surgically proven PC from prior parathyroidectomy and suspicious PC visible on ultrasound and request for treatment for uncontrolled hypercalcemia (Figure 1).
The purpose of the study is to characterize baseline multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) context and variability, evaluate the relationship between baseline fitness of patients with cancer and initial treatment recommendations, and assess the impact of the INSPIRE intervention, which involves including electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROs) within MDTB on MDTB discussion content, provider burden, treatment recommended and received, healthcare utilization, and patient-reported outcomes.
Frequently asked questions
What is a clinical trial?
It is a study of a new therapy or drug involving patients, conducted according to a strict protocol and under medical supervision. For many cancer patients, it provides access to therapies that are not yet standardly available. Read also: Clinical trial phases - what they mean →
Is participation in a clinical trial paid?
Participation is free for the patient - the costs of the tested treatment are covered by the trial sponsor. Some trials also reimburse travel and accommodation costs.
How to apply for a clinical trial abroad?
Start with the trial card in our Radar - you will find eligibility criteria and contact details of the center from ClinicalTrials.gov there. Contact is usually in English; if you need support, write to us.
Data from ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH, USA). AI translations may contain errors - always check the original. The foundation is not responsible for medical decisions made based on this information.
Alerts for new trials →You can help another person
We fund the Radar, this site, and the development of our Grosz dla Życia fundraising platform from donations and our own resources. Every contribution, even a small one, really helps.