To learn if giving 177Lu girentuximab in combination with cabozantinib plus nivolumab can help to control advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).
Clinical Trials Radar
Below you will find currently recruiting clinical trials for cancer patients - one click lets you show only trials conducted in Poland. The list is automatically updated from the ClinicalTrials.gov database, and we translate descriptions into Polish.
This is not medical advice - consult your oncologist
Descriptions are automatically translated with AI assistance. Always verify details in the original on ClinicalTrials.gov and consult your treating physician.
Found 1368 of 3478 trials— page 16 of 55
This phase II trial tests how well enfortumab vedotin (EV) and pembrolizumab works in treating patients with bladder cancer of variant histology (a group of less common types of bladder cancer) that have spread to nearby tissue or lymph nodes (locally advanced) or that has spread from where it first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic). Enfortumab vedotin is a monoclonal antibody, enfortumab, linked to an anticancer drug called vedotin. Enfortumab attaches to a protein called nectin-4 on cancer cells in a targeted way and delivers vedotin to kill them. It is a type of antibody-drug conjugate. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Giving enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab may kill more tumor cells in patients with locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer of variant histology.
The purpose of this study is to identify changes in Carbonic Anhydrase IX (CAIX) expression induced by hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha (HIF-2α) inhibition by initiating belzutifan single agent therapy and imaging CAIX expression with 89Zr-DFO-girentuximab PET before and 4 weeks after initiating treatment. This will be the first study to evaluate potential changes in CAIX expression altered by belzutifan. Information gained from this study will be leveraged to develop combinations of belzutifan with CAIX targeted agents including radioimmunotherapy in the future.
This is an open-label, multicenter Phase 2 study evaluating BMS-986504 in participants with advanced and/or metastatic solid tumors that have MTAP deletion. The study includes a monotherapy component and a combination component in which BMS-986504 is given with other anti-cancer agents. The trial will assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of BMS-986504 alone and in combination regimens.
This study is testing whether adding the drug sitagliptin to the standard immunotherapy pembrolizumab is safe and may help people with advanced melanoma or advanced renal cell carcinoma (kidney cancer) whose cancer has stopped responding to prior PD-1 or PD-L1 immunotherapy. The study has two parts. In the first part, small groups of participants will receive different doses of sitagliptin along with a fixed dose of pembrolizumab. This helps researchers find the highest dose of sitagliptin that can be given safely. In the second part, more participants will receive the safest dose to see how well the drug combination works against their cancer.
The purpose of this research study is to test the safety and efficacy of the combination of PD-L1 t-haNK (modified immune cells), NAI (a manufactured protein that stimulates the immune system), and cetuximab (a targeted antibody) in treating advanced head and neck cancer. The names of the therapies involved in this study are: * PD-L1 t-haNK cell therapy (a NK cell therapy infusion) * NAI (a type of recombinant human superagonist) * Cetuximab (a type of antibody)
This clinical trial is evaluating a drug called ART0380 in participants with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. The main goals of this study are to: * Find the recommended dose of ART0380 that can be given safely to participants alone and in combination with gemcitabine or irinotecan * Learn more about the side effects of ART0380 alone and in combination with gemcitabine or irinotecan * Learn more about the effectiveness of ART0380 alone and in combination with gemcitabine or irinotecan
The purpose of this platform study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary antitumor activity of novel RAS(ON) inhibitors combined with Standard(s) of Care (SOC) or with novel agents. The current subprotocols include the following: Subprotocol A: RMC-6236 + 5-fluorouracil-based regimens Subprotocol B: RMC-6236 + cetuximab with or without mFOLFOX6 Subprotocol C: RMC-6236 + gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel Subprotocol D: RMC-9805 with or without RMC-6236 + 5-fluorouracil-based regimens Subprotocol E: RMC-9805 with or without RMC-6236 + cetuximab with or without mFOLFOX6 Subprotocol F: RMC-9805 with or without RMC-6236 + gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel
This study aims to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of YMN-136 vaccine through a dose escalation trial, and to investigate whether YMN-136 vaccine can assist in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
This is a Phase 1/2 open-label, multi-center, multi-national study with an initial dose escalation part to determine the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of MCLA-158 single agent in patients with mCRC. The dose escalation part has been completed and the RP2D will be further evaluated in an expansion part of the study. Cohorts of selected solid tumor indications for which there is evidence of EGFR dependency and potential sensitivity to EGFR inhibition will be evaluated including head and neck cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The study will further assess the safety, tolerability, PK, PD, immunogenicity, and anti-tumor activity of MCLA-158 in monotherapy or in combination with other therapies.
This study will assess the safety and efficacy of VS-7375 alone and in combination with cetuximab in patients with metastatic KRAS G12D - mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
To learn if SAR445877 can help to control locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC in patients who have previously received ICI therapy.
This is a Phase 1/2, open-label, non-randomized, 4-part trial to determine the safety profile and identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of INBRX 106 administered as a single agent or in combination with the anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) pembrolizumab (Keytruda®). KEYTRUDA is a registered trademark of Merck Sharp \& Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck \& Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
The aim of the study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SKB571 for injection as monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with MET abnormalities. Eligible subjects will receive SKB571 monotherapy, until radiographic disease progression, intolerable toxicity, discontinuation of study treatment required by the subject, or other protocol-specified treatment discontinuation criteria, whichever occurs first.
This phase II trial tests how well GT103 in combination with pembrolizumab works in treating patients with STK11 mutant non-small cell lung cancer that may have spread from where it first started to nearby tissue, lymph nodes, or distant parts of the body (advanced) or that has spread from where it first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic). GT103 is a monoclonal antibody that may interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. GT103 targets the tumor cell-protein complement factor H found on some cancer cells and may provide specific anti-tumor activity that may help block the formation of growths that may become cancer. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Giving GT103 in combination with pembrolizumab may kill more cancer cells and improve outcomes in patients with advanced or metastatic STK11 mutant non-small cell lung cancer.
This is a phase II, multicenter, open-label, single-arm clinical study. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of culmerciclib combined with anti-HER2 targeted therapy and endocrine therapy as maintenance treatment in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer. Culmerciclib is a novel oral cyclin-dependent kinase 2/4/6 (CDK2/4/6) inhibitor. It has been approved in China for use in combination with fulvestrant in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who have progressed on prior endocrine therapy. Patients enrolled in this study will receive culmerciclib at a stepwise escalating dose of 120 mg, 150 mg, and 180 mg once daily, in combination with anti-HER2 therapy (trastuzumab with or without pertuzumab) and physician-selected endocrine therapy. Treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, withdrawal of consent, or loss to follow-up. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include objective response rate, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, overall survival, and safety.
This is a first in human, open-label, multi-center Phase 1 / 2 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and initial efficacy of AU-007, also known as imneskibart, in patients with advanced solid tumors. AU-007 will be administered either as a monotherapy, or in combination with a single loading dose of aldesleukin, or with both AU-007 and aldesleukin given every 2 weeks (Q2w). Once the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of AU-007 plus aldesleukin was determined, (AU-007 Q2w plus a single loading dose of aldesleukin), AU-007 plus aldesleukin is also being administered with avelumab or nivolumab.
This is a randomized, multicenter, phase II clinical trial evaluating prophylactic strategies to mitigate common toxicities associated with capivasertib in combination with fulvestrant in participants with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who are eligible for this treatment regimen.
This study will enroll adults with confirmed metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC, systemic PDAC treatment naïve), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1, and adequate organ function. Participants will receive pumitamig (also known as BNT327, BMS-986545, or PM8002) in combination with chemotherapy.
To explore the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib and albumin-paclitaxel combined with or without PD-1 antibody in the second-line treatment of advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma that failed to be treated by anti-PD-1 /PD-L1 regimen
This is an open-label, multicenter, Phase I/II clinical study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of MRG006A in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
This is a multi-site, three-cohort phase II trial of cabozantinib for IMDC all-risk frontline metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients OR any line mRCC patients who have not previously been treated with cabozantinib, and patients with pancreatic or extra-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Management of melanoma is based on primary excision of the tumor. In cases of melanoma with poor prognosis criteria, or when it is locally advanced or metastatic, there is an indication for the implementation of adjuvant therapy, which may, in this context, be immunotherapy. Immunotherapies are treatments that have revolutionized the prognosis of patients with melanoma. These are therapies that work by stimulating the immune system to enhance the anti-tumor response. Their toxicities are represented by immune-mediated toxicities, similar to true autoimmune diseases. Adapted physical activity as supportive care in oncology is expanding. From a pathophysiological perspective, physical activity is thought to modulate the immune system (by reducing inflammation, restoring immune surveillance, stimulating anti-tumor responses through the induction of T cell proliferation, modulating the gut microbiota, and influencing tumor microenvironment cells, etc.). The modulation of the immune system by physical activity may also allow us to hypothesize a modulation of the toxicities induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. We wish to study this hypothesis in patients with advanced melanoma who are candidates for immunotherapy. Originality and Innovative Aspects: Physical activity as supportive care in oncology has developed significantly in recent years. However, adapted physical activity (APA) is currently only offered at one center in France (CHU de Lille). In addition to the probable impact on patients\' quality of life, if we find evidence supporting a reduction in treatment-related toxicities for melanoma through physical activity, it would be even more interesting to introduce APA at the CHU of Montpellier. Primary and Secondary Objectives: Primary Objective: To analyze the association between the level of physical activity (estimated by the IPAQ questionnaire) at the initiation of immunotherapy and the occurrence of adverse effects at 6 months after starting treatment in adult patients with melanoma. Secondary Objectives: Analyze the association between physical activity level and treatment efficacy of immunotherapy in adult melanoma patients. Describe the quarterly evolution of patients\' general condition through measurement of WHO status and BMI. Assess the evolution of patients\' general condition: WHO status and BMI at treatment introduction, after 3 months, and at 6 months of treatment. Study the evolution of patients\' quality of life during their treatment based on their physical activity level, using the QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Preliminary study: We aim to evaluate the correlation between self-reported physical activity by patients and their actual physical activity. To obtain an objective measurement of patients\' physical activity level, we plan to work with the CARTIGEN platform and offer a small number of included patients (maximum of 50) to wear wrist actimeters for one week before treatment initiation. We will then analyze these data to determine patients\' baseline physical activity levels and compare them with the data collected via questionnaires. This is a prospective cohort study within the context of analytical epidemiological research. It is a bicentric study: CHRU Montpellier - Saint-Eloi Hospital and ICM Val d\'Aurelle. Using the collected data on patients\' physical activity levels (IPAQ questionnaire), we will compare two groups: patients who experienced immuno-toxicities without physical activity versus those with moderate or high physical activity. We will also analyze treatment efficacy in these two groups, patients\' quality of life, and the evolution of their general condition. Procedure: Inclusion is planned at day 0 (D0), with physical activity (IPAQ3) and quality of life (QLQ-C30) questionnaires, along with clinical and oncological evaluation. A follow-up visit at month 3 (M3) will include reassessment of clinical and oncological status, followed by another visit at month 6 (M6) for further clinical, oncological, physical activity, and quality of life reassessment. The inclusion period is expected to last 18 months. Outcomes / Perspectives: If we consider that physical exercise may help mitigate the toxic effects of treatments-an aspect we wish to explore through this project-it would be relevant to introduce adapted physical activity (APA) sessions supervised by a specialized instructor within the Dermatology Day Hospital at the CHU of Montpellier. Implementing APA in the context of onco-dermatology will strengthen the multidisciplinary approach of the CHU. Collaboration between healthcare professionals, including specialized APA instructors, will foster effective care coordination. This initiative is part of a holistic approach to patient care, integrating complementary interventions to address physical, psychological, and social needs.
This study will investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and anti-tumor activity of CBI-1214 in participants with advanced or metastatic Microsatellite Stable (MSS)/Microsatellite Instability Low (MSI-L) Colorectal Cancer
To find the highest dose of NK cells that can be given by vein and intraperitoneally (given directly into the abdominal cavity) in combination with cetuximab to patients with colorectal cancer that has spread to the peritoneum.
Frequently asked questions
What is a clinical trial?
It is a study of a new therapy or drug involving patients, conducted according to a strict protocol and under medical supervision. For many cancer patients, it provides access to therapies that are not yet standardly available. Read also: Clinical trial phases - what they mean →
Is participation in a clinical trial paid?
Participation is free for the patient - the costs of the tested treatment are covered by the trial sponsor. Some trials also reimburse travel and accommodation costs.
How to apply for a clinical trial abroad?
Start with the trial card in our Radar - you will find eligibility criteria and contact details of the center from ClinicalTrials.gov there. Contact is usually in English; if you need support, write to us.
Data from ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH, USA). AI translations may contain errors - always check the original. The foundation is not responsible for medical decisions made based on this information.
Alerts for new trials →You can help another person
We fund the Radar, this site, and the development of our Grosz dla Życia fundraising platform from donations and our own resources. Every contribution, even a small one, really helps.