Clinical Trials Radar

Below you will find currently recruiting clinical trials for cancer patients - one click lets you show only trials conducted in Poland. The list is automatically updated from the ClinicalTrials.gov database, and we translate descriptions into Polish.

This is not medical advice - consult your oncologist

Descriptions are automatically translated with AI assistance. Always verify details in the original on ClinicalTrials.gov and consult your treating physician.

4862
active trials
264
with Poland location
Last update
Oct 18, 2026, 04:08 AM

Showing all 4862 trials— page 189 of 195

RecruitingPhase IIIFemale onlyBreast cancerTriple negative (TNBC)

In TNBC patients who have completed neoadjuvant immunotherapy and local treatment, a 9-cycle regimen of PD-1 inhibitor adjuvant immunotherapy is currently considered the standard approach. Based on the classification according to their BRCA mutation status, patients with BRCA mutations choose the PD-1 inhibitor + PARPi regimen, while patients without BRCA mutations opt for the PD-1 inhibitor + capecitabine regimen. Compared to monotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors, these combination regimens may offer improved efficacy and acceptable tolerability. This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, single-center phase III trial aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of selecting PARPi or capecitabine in combination with PD-1 inhibitors based on germline BRCA1/2 mutations as adjuvant therapy in high-risk TNBC patients who have achieved non-pCR after completion of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in conjunction with chemotherapy and local treatment.

Breast cancer (BC), especially premenopausal, is emerging rapidly in East Asia in recent 20 years. Half of the breast cancer patients in Asia are younger than 50 years of age. In general, younger or premenopausal patients are associated with poorer prognosis. Premenopausal patients have higher estrogen levels than those in older (postmenopausal) patients. Estrogen is known to suppress anti-tumor T cell response and leading to tumor progression in different animal models (Clin Cancer Res 2016 22:6204), including lung cancer, melanoma, ovarian cancer. One of the mechanisms that contributes to estrogen's suppression of T cell function is via the mobilization of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). Targeting ER signaling with hormonal therapy can abolish MDSC mobilization, and sensitize tumor cells to antigen specific T cell or NK cell killing (Cancer Discovery 2018 7:72 2017). These study results further support the hypothesis that, E2 is associated with immunosuppressive effect, and may contribute to the suppression of immune surveillance in young female breast cancer patients. These results suggest that E2 may suppress anti-tumor immunity, and E2 reduction improve the anti-tumor immunity. In our preliminary works, the investigators found higher dose (equivalent to premenopausal women serum level) of E2 suppressed T cell activities, while lower dose E2 (postmenopausal serum level) activated T cell activity. The investigators have investigated the combination of anti-PD1 antibody and GnRH agonist plus exemestane (an aromatase inhibitor which will block the production of E2 from adipose tissue) in ER positive premenopausal breast cancer patient refractory to prior endocrine therapy in metastatic setting. The response rate was 38.4%, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.2 months. This outstanding result were presented in AACR 2021 oral session (Cancer Res 2021 81:13\_Supplement, CT028). On the other hand, progesterone is also well known for its anti-inflammation and immune tolerance activity. This possibly makes estrogen reduction treatments, such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH agonist), an important partner in augmenting neoadjuvant therapy for patients with premenopausal breast cancer. For triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), endocrine therapy has no anti-tumor effect. On the other hand, the use of GnRH agonist has been tested for the protection of ovary function of young female while receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Surprisingly, the concomitant use of goserelin and adjuvant chemotherapy improved disease-free survival (HR 0.47, P=0.04) and overall survival (HR 0.45, P=0.05) versus chemotherapy alone in ER negative premenopausal early BC patients in POEMS study, which was initially aimed to improve the success pregnant rate (N Engl J Med 2015 372;923). Endocrine therapy is theoretically antagonist to chemotherapy therapy when concomitantly use. In another report analyzed the outcome of both pre- and postmenopausal women who entered two randomized trials (Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ovest-Mammella Intergruppo studies) on adjuvant chemotherapy and received either concomitant or sequential hormonal therapy. The result showed a decreasing trend (P = 0.015) in hazard ratio of death with increasing age was observed, indicating that concomitant therapy is more effective than sequential therapy in young patients (Annals of Oncology 2008;19(2):299-307). These results support the hypothesis that, E2 suppression/ER inhibition therapy may modulate immune microenvironment, thereby enhancing the chemotherapy induced immunogenic death effect. The investigators hypothesized that, estrogen level reduction by ovarian function suppression can modulate immune microenvironment, thereby augmenting adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy, regardless of the estrogen receptor (ER) status of cancer cell. Therefore, the investigators plan to test this hypothesis in real clinical model, with standard clinical recommended treatment doses. The study is designed to evaluate whether the GnRH agonist can provide the therapeutic benefit for premenopausal TNBC patients via modulating immune microenvironment. Premenopausal TNBC patients will receive GnRH agonist and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the efficacy and immune microenvironment change of co-administration arm will be measured and compared with chemotherapy alone control arm.

The purpose of this study is to find out whether the study drug, LY4052031, is safe, tolerable and effective in participants with advanced, or metastatic solid tumors including urothelial cancer. The study is conducted in two parts - phase Ia (dose-escalation, dose-optimization) and phase Ib (dose-expansion). The study will last up to approximately 4 years.

This is a Phase 0/1, First-in-Human (FIH), study to evaluate safety, tolerability, biodistribution, radiation dosimetry and preliminary anti-tumour activities of 177Lu-RAD204 in participants with selected solid tumours, to identify the MTDs/ recommended doses of 177Lu-RAD204 for future exploration. The study will consist of a Pre-screening Period (if applicable for PD-L1 testing), a Screening Period of up to 4 weeks, followed by a Phase 0 (Imaging) Period for imaging and dosimetry to 177Lu-RAD204im and a Phase I (Treatment) Period for 177Lu-RAD204tr dose escalation.

This is a prospective, multicenter, phase I/II, open-label, two-stage design of PD1+ TILs infusion in metastatic or advanced TNBC. TILS001 includes 3 parts. Previous to each phase inclusion, a specific ICF must be signed by the patient. Participants potentially eligible to participate in the clinical trial will be offered to sign a ICF three times prior to TILs treatment: 1) to allow for collection of archival FFPE tissue samples for determination PD1 by mRNA (Part #1), 2) prior to a fresh metastatic biopsy for selection, isolation and partial expansion of PD1+ TILs (Part #2) and 3) prior to allow for remaining study procedures and TILs therapy (Part #3, Main Consent).

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment and work by blocking protein interactions that normally prevent the immune system from recognizing and destroying cancer cells. However, these agents, now approved for over 15 types of cancers and for both early-stage and metastatic disease, are capable of causing inflammation in any organ system of the body that can lead to organ damage, dysfunction, and even death in rare cases. Some patients may suffer acute and treatable complications like joint pain, but some may have irreversible complications like hypothyroidism that requires daily, life-long medication. It is therefore important to fully understand the different types of damage ICIs can cause to better monitor patients receiving ICI therapy. A rising concern from recent reports in the literature is that ICIs may weaken bone and increase the risk of fractures. In this study, the investigators aim to characterize how ICIs impact the bone by examining several factors in patients undergoing curative-intent ICI treatment either alone or in combination with chemotherapy: bone mineral density, bone volume, and markers of bone turnover in the blood. The study will use two imaging techniques to assess bone mineral density and volume. DXA (dual X-ray absorptiometry) imaging uses low-dose X-rays to measure how dense (or strong) bones are and is often used to diagnose or assess the risk of osteoporosis. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) is a 3D imaging technology that can quantify bone structure and volume and offers high resolution that can be used to assess bone in smaller bones of the peripheral skeleton. The investigators hypothesize that ICI treatment will weaken bones and increase the risk of fractures. As ICI therapy is relatively new, a rising number of patients may be at risk of fractures or have low bone density that is not being monitored because there are no guidelines in place notifying physicians of this potential risk to patients. This is study will provide important preliminary data that will be the basis for larger studies in the future aiming to better monitor and potentially treat bone weakening in patients treated with ICIs to reduce the pain, inconvenience, and complications from fragility fractures.

A prospective, multicenter, observational study to evaluate the correlation of Molecular Residual Disease (MRD) detection using circulating tumor DNA guided test to pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in stage I-III triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Results from this study aim to improve MRD detection and disease outcomes for future patients.

EPS101-10-02 is a Phase Ib open label, multicentre clinical trial comprising of a Dose Escalation phase (Part 1) followed by a Dose Expansion phase (Part 2) of MOv18 IgE in patients with folate receptor alpha-expressing (5% or higher) platinum resistant ovarian cancer The dose escalation part of the study will primarily assess the safety and tolerability of MOv18 IgE in ascending dose cohorts, until the determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose (MAD). Part 2 (dose expansion) will further assess the safety, tolerability and anti-tumour activity of MOv18 IgE.

The primary objectives of the study are: (1) in the dose-escalation part: to evaluate safety and tolerability and to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of farletuzumab ecteribulin (MORAb-202) in participants with selected tumor types (ovarian cancer \[OC\], endometrial cancer \[EC\], non-small cell lung carcinoma \[NSCLC\], triple-negative breast cancer \[TNBC\]), and (2) in dose-confirmation part: to evaluate preliminary efficacy measured by objective response rate (ORR) of farletuzumab ecteribulin (MORAb-202) in participants with OC and EC at selected doses and to further evaluate the safety and tolerability of farletuzumab ecteribulin (MORAb-202) and (3) dose-optimization part. (divided in two parts: Part A \[OC and EC participants\] and Part B \[OC only\]): Part A: to evaluate other farletuzumab ecteribulin (MORAb-202) treatment regimens for safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy in participants with OC and EC; to evaluate the addition of short course of oral corticosteroids following every dose of farletuzumab ecteribulin (MORAb-202) administered every 21 days; and to select treatment regimens with farletuzumab ecteribulin (MORAb-202) for further evaluation in Part B. Part B: to evaluate the safety and tolerability of different doses of farletuzumab ecteribulin (MORAb-202) as monotherapy and in combination with lenvatinib and to determine the recommended dose (RD) of farletuzumab ecteribulin (MORAb-202) as monotherapy and in combination with lenvatinib.

This study is a single-arm, multicenter, prospective phase II clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QL1706 in combination with anlotinib hydrochloride and nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for advanced triple-negative breast cancer. A total of 34 participants with first-line advanced triple-negative breast cancer are enrolled in this study: Enrolled participants receive QL1706 (5 mg/kg, Q3W, day 1) + anlotinib (12 mg per dose, QD, days 1-14, Q3W) + nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m², days 1 and 8, Q3W), with a 21-day cycle. Treatment continues until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, the investigator's judgment that the participant no longer derives benefit, withdrawal of informed consent by the participant, completion of 2 years of QL1706 treatment, or other reasons specified in the protocol. The study consists of a screening period (from the signing of informed consent to no more than 28 days before the first dose), a treatment period (including on-treatment visits and end-of-treatment visit), and a follow-up period (including safety follow-up and survival follow-up). Screening Period: The screening period begins after the participant signs the informed consent form and ends at enrollment, lasting no more than 28 days. Eligible participants are those with pathologically confirmed, previously untreated first-line triple-negative breast cancer. During screening, participant information, samples, and blood specimens are collected as needed. Participants who meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria are enrolled. Treatment Period: Study drugs are administered within 3 days of enrollment. Each treatment cycle is 3 weeks. Study treatment continues until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, initiation of new anti-cancer therapy, loss to follow-up, death, withdrawal of informed consent, or other reasons, with a maximum treatment duration of 2 years (whichever occurs first). Safety assessments are performed every 3 weeks, and tumor imaging evaluations are performed every 6 weeks (±7 days) according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. Follow-up Period: When participants discontinue study treatment or withdraw early, they are still required to complete the corresponding assessments as specified in the protocol. Safety Follow-up: At 30 days (±7 days) after the last dose, participants return to the site for one follow-up visit, during which blood samples are collected and safety examinations are performed. Survival Follow-up: Every 2 months. Survival status and subsequent treatment information are collected by telephone or other appropriate means.

This study is a single-center, prospective, single-arm clinical trial, which intends to enroll patients with triple-negative breast cancer with brain metastases to receive ivonescimab combined with TROP2 ADC (such as sacituzumab govitecan) treatment until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of informed consent, or the investigator deems it necessary to discontinue the medication, and to collect data on the drug's efficacy and safety.

For patients with breast cancer, it's important to find any remaining cancer cells after they've had their main treatment. Even a few cells, called minimal residual disease (MRD), can lead to the cancer coming back later. A way to find these cells is by looking for tiny bits of cancer DNA that are shed into the blood. This is called circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). A simple blood test, often called a liquid biopsy, can detect this ctDNA. This research aims to see if finding this cancer DNA in the blood can help predict if a patient's cancer will return. It also may help find out if the treatment is working. Ultimately, the results of this research may help doctors better manage breast cancer and develop new and improved tests and treatments.

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive of breast cancers and it is usually treated with chemotherapy even before surgery. In many cases, the chemotherapy completely "melts" the tumor and these patients do well. When the tumor is not eliminated by the chemotherapy, the patient receive more chemotherapy after surgery to decrease the chances of it coming back. Yet many of these patients don't need that extra chemotherapy and will do well in any case. One of the most exciting recent developments in cancer is the use of "liquid biopsies". It turns out that the tumor's DNA, RNA and proteins can be detected in small vesicles found in the patient's blood. Thanks to advances in Artificial Intelligence, there is now informatics tools to integrate many types of molecular information. Our industrial partner, MIMs, will apply novel informatics tools to generate a test using all the molecular information obtained from blood vesicles and tissue that will be able to find out early if tumor has spread outside of the breast, and how much tumor is left after surgery. The goal is hope to develop a multi-dimensional test for TNBC patients that can be used to decide how much treatment they need and if treatment given after surgery is working.

This is a Phase I/II Study to determine the safety and efficacy of Sacituzumab Govitecan and Zimberelimab with stereotactic radiation (SRS) in participants with metastatic triple negative breast cancer with brain metastases, compared to treatment with Sacituzumab Govitecan alone.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Viscum album extract when used in combination with pembrolizumab as adjuvant chemotherapy in adult patients (aged 19 and older) who have been diagnosed with malignant neoplasm of unilateral breast and have completed surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the addition of Viscum album improve clinical outcomes when combined with pembrolizumab as adjuvant chemotherapy? Is Viscum album safe and tolerable for use in this patient population?

This is a single arm phase II trial combination of ivonescimab and carbo-docetaxel every 3 weeks for 6 cycles in patients with early-stage triple negative breast cancer. The trial is designed to test the safety and efficacy of adding ivonescimab in patients with early TNBC undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and docetaxel. Patients will receive ivonescimab 20 mg/kg IV on Day 1 of each cycle, and carboplatin AUC6 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each cycle for 6 cycles. Cycles will be 21 days for a total of 6 cycles. Curative intent surgery will be performed within 6 weeks (maximum 12 weeks) time frame upon completion of last dose of chemoimmunotherapy. The surgical pathology information will be used for assessment of pathological response, which serve as the primary endpoint of this study. Patients will undergo assessment at baseline, C1D1 of each cycle and end of treatment visit for collection of treatment-emergent adverse events, evaluated by CTCAE v5.0. Patient reported outcomes will be collected at cycles 1, 4, and 6, and at EOT. All study patients will be followed for at least 5 years for EFS and OS follow up. Research biopsies, peripheral blood and stool samples will be collected at the following time points: baseline, C4D1 (+/-14 days), and surgery (+/-14 days). Baseline and EOT breast MRI will be performed as standard of care for assessment of clinical response. Mid treatment breast ultrasound (C4D1 +/-14 days) will be repeated as standard of care to assess clinical response to treatment. Mid-treatment C4D1 tumor biopsy may be omitted if the primary tumor is no longer visible or the tumor deemed too small for biopsy by radiologist.

The main objectives of this study are to assess the safety, tolerability, immunological activity, and preliminary efficacy of the Modi-1 Moditope vaccine, both as monotherapy and in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab with or without Ipilimumab (where these are standard of care in a non-neoadjuvant setting), in patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), advanced/unresectable human papillomavirus-negative squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), high grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), or renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Modi-1 Moditope will also be investigated in the neoadjuvant setting for patients with SCCHN undergoing curative intent surgical resection in combination with pembrolizumab versus the Modi-1 alone.

This is a first in human phase 1 study of AG01 an anti-Progranulin/Glycoprotein88 (PGRN/GP88) antibody in patients with advanced solid tumors. AG01 is a recombinant monoclonal antibody expressed in a CHO production cell line. The antibody AG01 binds to human PGRN/GP88, expressed on cancer cells. This study will have a dose escalation portion (1A) to evaluate maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or maximum administered dose (MAD), the safety and tolerability of AG01treatment before the dose expansion portion (1B) of the study is initiated. The dose escalation portion of this study (1A) will also be used to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of AG01 antibody to be evaluated in the cohort expansion portion (1B).

Frequently asked questions

What is a clinical trial?

It is a study of a new therapy or drug involving patients, conducted according to a strict protocol and under medical supervision. For many cancer patients, it provides access to therapies that are not yet standardly available. Read also: Clinical trial phases - what they mean →

Is participation in a clinical trial paid?

Participation is free for the patient - the costs of the tested treatment are covered by the trial sponsor. Some trials also reimburse travel and accommodation costs.

How to apply for a clinical trial abroad?

Start with the trial card in our Radar - you will find eligibility criteria and contact details of the center from ClinicalTrials.gov there. Contact is usually in English; if you need support, write to us.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH, USA). AI translations may contain errors - always check the original. The foundation is not responsible for medical decisions made based on this information.

Alerts for new trials →

You can help another person

We fund the Radar, this site, and the development of our Grosz dla Życia fundraising platform from donations and our own resources. Every contribution, even a small one, really helps.