Clinical Trials Radar

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of mRNA-4106 monotherapy and of mRNA-4200 in combination with checkpoint inhibitor therapy in participants with solid tumors.

To find a recommended dose of HC-7366 to patients with AML. The safety and effects of this drug combination will also be studied.

The Phase I trial is evaluating safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of MBS8(1V270) in subjects with advanced solid tumours. The trial is designed to provide data for further clinical development of MBS8(1V270)

The purpose of this study is to help prevent skin cancer by improving the use of sun protective behaviors among youths living in rural communities in Utah and West Virginia.

This clinical trial is a platform-type clinical study intended to investigate the efficacy and safety of MRD-positive acute myeloid leukemia patients after comprehensive treatment, which includes but is not limited to the following drugs and protocols: Chemotherapy, small molecule targeted drugs, demethylation drugs, liposome drugs and the combination of these drugs to form a combination of treatment regimen, the specific treatment regimen will be updated according to the results of this trial and the latest research progress at home and abroad.

This phase II trial studies the side effects and how well azacitidine and enasidenib work in treating patients with IDH2-mutant myelodysplastic syndrome. Azacitidine and enasidenib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.

This is a prospective, single-arm clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of metformin in inhibiting DNMT3A R882-driven clonal hematopoiesis (CH) in patients with acute leukemia (AL) who are in remission and under follow-up. Patients with DNMT3A R882 mutation (VAF ≥5%) will receive oral metformin for 6 months, with dosage gradually increased to 2000 mg/day. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with effective decline in DNMT3A R882 mutation VAF at 6 months. Secondary endpoints include VAF decline at 3 months, relapse-free survival (RFS) at 6 and 12 months, overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), cumulative remission-phase mortality, and adverse event rates. Planned enrollment: 32 participants.

This phase II trial compares standard consolidation with daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone to consolidation with teclistamab following standard induction therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant for improving overall survival of patients with plasma cell leukemia. Consolidation therapy is treatment given after initial therapy to kill any cancer cells that may remain in the body. Daratumumab is in a class of medications called monoclonal antibodies. It binds to a protein called CD38, which is found on some types of immune cells and cancer cells, including myeloma cells. Daratumumab may block CD38 and help the immune system kill cancer cells. Carfilzomib inhibits protein complexes called proteasomes, which inhibits cancer cell growth and leads to cancer cell death. Lenalidomide may help kill cancer cells and prevents the growth of blood vessels that cancer cells need to survive. Dexamethasone is in a class of medications called corticosteroids. It is used to reduce inflammation and lower the body's immune response to help lessen the side effects of chemotherapy drugs. Teclistamab is a monoclonal antibody that may interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. A monoclonal antibody is a type of protein that can bind to certain targets in the body, such as molecules that cause the body to make an immune response (antigens). Giving teclistamab as consolidation therapy after induction and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant may improve survival outcomes in patients with plasma cell leukemia, compared to standard consolidation with daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone.

This study entails enrolling participants that have been diagnosed with cancer to Olivia, a commercially available AI-enabled personal health platform developed by Tempus. Olivia will serve as the primary interface for eConsent and enrollment into the registry. The platform will also help create a retrospective and prospective registry by working with over 1,000 healthcare systems to combine electronic health records (EHR) and Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in a single spot. There may be sub-studies as an add-on to this parent protocol. The sub-studies will address specific goals of the targeted research activities and will usually include additional information specific to each research study.

The study is designed to examine the feasibility and safety of collecting autologous hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) to be combined with CAR T-cell therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) hematological disease. The study will evaluate feasibility of collecting the target dose of HSCs from at least 50% of enrolled patients. The study will assess safety based on incidence and severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in the first 60 days post CAR T dosing, and also through the collection of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) as well as the durability of response after treatment with HSCs with CAR T. The study follows an open-label, single-center and single non-randomized cohort design. 20 subjects with r/r hematological malignancies will be enrolled and treated to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary safety of collecting autologous HSCs and combining them with CAR T-cell therapy.

AML is highly heterogeneous in pathogenesis, and CEBPA double-mutated (CEBPAdm) AML is a common type of leukemia in China. Currently, no targeted therapies for CEBPAdm, and chemotherapy and transplantation are still the treatment options for CEBPA double-mutated AML. At present, the "3+7" treatment induction regimen of cytarabine combined with anthracyclines is still the first-line recommended regimen. In our retrospective study, the intermediate dose HAD regimen produced a 3-year RFS of 84.7% and a 3-year OS of 92.8% in CEBPAdm AML. Therefore, this project intends to confirm the efficacy of intermediate-dose HAD in the treatment of CEBPA double-mutated AML is superior to the conventional treatment regimen through the multi-center RCT study.

The purpose of this study is to establish the safety of novel dosing and ramp-up schedules for sonrotoclax in participants with hematological malignancies.

This is a Phase I, multicenter, single-arm, open-label clinical study designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of JL19001 Injection as monotherapy (Phase Ia) or in combination with standard therapy (Phase Ib) in patients with AST and r/r B-NHL. Only the Phase Ia protocol design is registered at this time. A total of 6 dose cohorts are planned for Phase Ia, i.e., 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 μg/kg, with the administration route being subcutaneous injection. A traditional 3 + 3 dose escalation design will be used. The MTD and Recommended Maximum Add-on Dose (RMAD) for JL19001 Injection will be determined.

Return to work (RTW) of patients after cancer treatment has been a topic of growing interest for the past two decades. Advances in cancer care have led to better patient survival, with some cancers considered as chronic or even cured diseases. The return of patients to their "pre-cancer life" can thus become an objective. Indeed, RTW after cancer is associated with improved quality of life for patients in several studies (improved financial status, improved social contacts, return of functional abilities and improved self-esteem). However, many difficulties can interfere with RTW. Many factors have been identified: disease, treatment, patient and occupational factors. The feeling of "return-to-work self-efficacy" is one of the main psychological determinants and its interest has been recently demonstrated in oncology. It corresponds to a cognitive mechanism based on expectations and/or beliefs of an individual about being able to carry out the actions required to achieve a goal, in this case RTW. The majority of studies on RTW concerns solid cancer and are retrospective. Very few studies have focused on hematological malignancies, whose prognosis was, until recently, worse. Moreover, very few interventional studies exist. There is therefore a significant need for prospective studies with appropriate methodological tools to reliably assess the benefit of interventional measures on RTW. The investigators propose to conduct a prospective, comparative, randomized, multicenter study evaluating the impact of an early RTW-consultation in patients who have been treated for a hematological malignancy. The investigators hypothesize that this consultation will improve patients' RTW rates and RTW quality.

To learn about the safety of giving the drug brexucabtagene autoleucel to participants with relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL after treatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin, blinatumomab, and either hyper-CVAD or mini-hyper-CVD. Also, to learn if giving brexucabtagene autoleucel to patients with relapsed/refractory or high-risk, newly diagnosed B-cell ALL after treatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin, blinatumomab, and either hyper-CVAD or mini-hyper-CVD can help to control the disease.

This is a Phase I/II interventional, open-label treatment study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of concomitant therapy with anti-CD19 CAR T-cells and Lenalidomide in adult patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have been pretreated with Ibrutinib for 3 months prior to leukapheresis.

This phase II trial studies the side effects and how well combination chemotherapy works in treating patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, lymphoblastic lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma/leukemia, or double-hit lymphoma/leukemia that has come back or does not respond to treatment. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as clofarabine, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, vincristine sulfate liposome, dexamethasone and bortezomib, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading.

This is a prospective, single-center phase I/II study, with the purpose of evaluating the efficiency of golidocitinib combined with chidamide in patients with systemically-treated cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. The primary endpoint of the phase I study was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), while the primary endpoint of the phase II study was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included the complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and safety profile.

This is a prospective, open-label, non-randomized cohort study evaluating the efficacy and safety of a pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimen (IH-2014 based) combined with venetoclax and immunotherapy in adult patients with newly diagnosed Ph-negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL). Patients aged ≥14years,≤60 years will be enrolled. Treatment includes induction, consolidation, early intensification, delayed intensification, and maintenance phases. The use and number of cycles of immunotherapy will be based on patient preference. The primary endpoint is Event-Free Survival (EFS) and MRD-negative CR rates after induction therapy(by flow cytometry and NGS). Secondary endpoints include Complete Remission (CR) rate, MRD-negative CR rates at 12 weeks (by flow cytometry and NGS), Overall Survival (OS), Relapse-Free Survival (RFS), and cumulative relapse rate.

The investigators have previously proposed a prediction model for difficult transoral and submental thyroidectomy through a retrospective study. In order to better promote transoral and submental endoscopic approach for thyroid surgery and to set up an appropriate training course, the investigators aim to refine the procedure through a prospective study.

The purpose of this study is to find out if mosunetuzumab is an effective treatment in people with follicular lymphoma that was recently diagnosed and have not yet received any treatments for their disease.

The overall objectives of this BETRNet Research Center (RC) are: 1. to conduct a rigorous, integrated spectrum of transdisciplinary human research in Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (ECA) 2. to increase the biological understanding of key observations made by our clinical researchers; 3. to translate knowledge derived from genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptome research to solving clinical dilemmas in detection, prognosis, prevention, and therapy of BE in order to prevent EAC and improve the outcomes of EAC; 4. to foster a transdisciplinary and translation research culture and to effectively expand and enhance scientific research focused on BE and EAC; 5. to evaluate research and transdisciplinary programs and to continuously improve research, productivity and enhance translational implementation. These objectives build and synergize on existing multi-institutional collaborative networks and the considerable clinical, basic science, and translational expertise available at our institutions, focusing on improving the outcomes of patients with BE and EAC. The overarching organization framework for this RC proposal is 1) to focus laboratory research on understanding the genetic susceptibility, genomic and epigenetic changes that influence the development of BE and EAC; and 2) to then translate laboratorydiscoveries into clinical applications for effective detection, molecular risk stratification, and prevention of progression from BE to EAC.

This study aims to provide a comprehensive report on clinicopathologic features, immunohistochemical/biomarker testing and molecular profile of cervical clear cell carcinoma. This study may help researchers learn more about the molecular profile of cervical clear cell carcinoma.

This is a phase 1, multicentre, first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation/consolidation study to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of orally administered JBI-778 in EGFR mutated lung cancer patients with or without brain metastasis, IDH mutated WHO grade 3 /4 recurrent glioma and ACC with evidence of recurrent, metastatic or advanced, incurable disease arising from any primary site. A total of 42 patients will be recruited in the study. The initial dose escalation up to cohort 3 (estimate to be 160mg) or until the pharmacologically active dose is reached, whichever comes first as determined by the safety committee will be performed only in EGFR mutant NSCLC patients with or without stable cerebral metastases and ACC patients. Once this dose level is reached IDH mutant WHO grade 3 /4 glioma patients will be added. Once the RP2D is determined following dose escalation, additional patients, up to 12, will be treated at that dose to obtain further safety data and preliminary efficacy. Approximately 4 to 6 sites are anticipated for the dose-escalation/consolidation, additional sites will be evaluated as needed. Study will be initiated only after receipt of regulatory and ethics committee (EC) approval. After signing the informed consent form, the patients will undergo screening assessments to confirm eligibility. Eligible patients will be considered first for initial dose escalation and once the RP2D is determined following dose escalation, additional patients, up to 12, will be treated at that dose to obtain further safety data and preliminary efficacy. The RP2D will be establish after a detailed analysis of the totality of dose escalation data, including PK, safety, efficacy, CNS penetration based on CSF sample for study drug presence, analysis of PD markers in peripheral blood and both pre-treatment and on treatment tumor biopsies. The duration of participation for each patient will be as follows: Screening: - Up to 21 days (-21 to 1 days); Treatment period: Treatment cycle of 21-day each. Treatment may continue for up to 2 years from the start of treatment, provided that the patient experiences clinical benefit in the opinion of the Investigator and shows no signs or symptoms of unequivocal progression of the disease, unacceptable toxicity, or other reasons for study discontinuation. End of treatment (EOT)/ Early termination (ET) visit Safety Follow-up: 30 days after last dose Survival: Every 3 months

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if selectively omitting postoperative cervical irradiation is a safe and feasible treatment strategy for patients with resected, locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) who underwent systematic neck dissection and have no high-risk nodal factors. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is the regional recurrence rate with selective omission of postoperative cervical irradiation non-inferior to the recurrence rate reported with standard complete nodal irradiation (6-8%)? * Does selective omission of postoperative cervical irradiation reduce toxicity? * Does selective omission of postoperative cervical irradiation improve immunological preservation and quality of life? Researchers will compare outcomes in participants treated with this selective irradiation strategy to previously published data and to a retrospective institutional cohort treated with standard complete nodal irradiation, to see if it maintains regional control while reducing toxicity and preserving immune function and quality of life. Participants will: * Receive postoperative radiotherapy according to the new protocol, omitting irradiation of low-risk nodal levels * Receive concomitant chemotherapy if clinically indicated, per standard practice * Visit for checkups, blood sample collection, to complete quality-of-life questionnaires and attend follow-up visits over 48 months