Abiraterone

The primary objective of this study is to measure efficacy of saruparib + physician's choice of ARPI compared with placebo + ARPI in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) who have previously received docetaxel chemotherapy or a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed lutetium-177 radioligand therapy with no evidence of disease progression and PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL.

This Phase II study aims to evaluate efficacy and safety of the combination of JSB462 (also known as luxdegalutamide) at 100 mg and 300 mg once a day (QD) doses + abiraterone compared with an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI, abiraterone or enzalutamide) in participants with metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC) and to select the recommended dose of the combination for phase III. Towards that end, the totality of the efficacy, safety, tolerability and PK data from participants randomized in the study will be evaluated

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of BMS-986365 versus the investigator's choice of therapy in participants with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

The intention of the study is to demonstrate superiority of AZD2265 relative to standard of care treatments by assessment of radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) in participants with mCRPC.

The purpose of this substudy is to assess the efficacy and safety of ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd), given alone or with other treatments in participants with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The goals of this study are to learn about: * The safety of the study treatment and if people tolerate it. * A safe dose level of I-DXd that can be used with other treatments. * Participant levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA) during treatment.

This phase III trial studies how well standard systemic therapy with or without definitive treatment (prostate removal surgery or radiation therapy) works in treating participants with prostate cancer that has spread to other places in the body. Addition of prostate removal surgery or radiation therapy to standard systemic therapy for prostate cancer may lower the chance of the cancer growing or spreading.

This study aims to evaluate how well risvutatug rezetecan (Ris-Rez) works in treating prostate cancer compared to best supportive/standard of care (BSC) which may include a hormone therapy with an androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI), by checking whether it makes cancers smaller or disappear completely, if it helps participants live longer, and/or feel better. The study is also assessing whether Ris-Rez is safe and tolerated well by participants and aims to provide a better understanding of the side effects of the drug.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of two different treatment combinations of tulmimetostat in participants with de novo or recurrent metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Phase I aims to determine the recommended dose(s) for expansion (RDE) of tulmimetostat in combination with darolutamide or abiraterone. Phase II is designed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of tulmimetostat in combination with darolutamide compared with darolutamide alone in participants with mHSPC.

The advent of PSMA-PET has improved sensitivity and specificity in staging prostate cancer, particularly in intermediate- and high-risk disease. This has created uncertainty in the management of patients with PSMA-positive but conventionally negative pelvic lymphadenopathy (i.e., \<1 cm in smallest diameter). This study evaluates outcomes of enhanced androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with abiraterone and prednisone compared to standard ADT, both in combination with radiation therapy, in patients with prostate cancer and PSMA-positive but conventionally negative pelvic lymphadenopathy. A total of 140 eligible participants will be randomized to receive either enhanced ADT with abiraterone and prednisone or standard ADT, both with concurrent radiation therapy. Participants will be followed for 5 years after completion of ADT to assess outcomes. The primary objective is to determine whether enhanced ADT improves 5-year failure-free survival compared to standard ADT. Secondary objectives include evaluation of toxicity, quality of life, biochemical progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and metastasis-free survival. Exploratory objectives include evaluation of tumor growth and regression rates using PSA values and assessment of the relationship between treatment outcomes and blood-based heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) levels.

The overall aim of the trial is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of AMG 509 (monotherapy and in combination with abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide) and to evaluate preliminary efficacy. As of Protocol Amendment 10 (09 July 2025), only Parts 4A expansion, 6, and 7 are open to accrual.

This is a multi-centre, investigator-initiated, three-arm, randomized trial to investigate the addition on androgen receptor pathway inhibitor and atorvastatin to standard of care radiation and hormone therapy improve quality of life. Participants will either receive standard of care radiation and hormone (ADT) therapy (Arm 1), standard of care radiation and hormone (ADT) therapy plus oral abiraterone for 8-9 months (Arm 3) or standard of care radiation and hormone (ADT) therapy plus oral abiraterone for 8-9 months plus atorvastatin for 2 years (Arm 4). Participants will be routinely follow-up in clinic or remotely for up to 5 years.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 177Lu-TLX591 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have progressed following treatment with Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitor Treatment

This phase II trial studies the effects of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and the timing of treatment with androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in treating patients with hormone sensitive prostate cancer that has spread from where it first started to other places in the body (metastatic), and that has come back after a period of improvement (recurrent). It also studies the effects of salvage radiation therapy (sXRT) on prostate cancer and to see if radiation to the pelvis helps prevent prostate cancer from spreading elsewhere. SBRT is a type of external radiation therapy that uses special equipment to position a patient and precisely deliver radiation to tumors in the body (except the brain). The total dose of radiation is divided into smaller doses given over several days. This type of radiation therapy helps spare normal tissue. Androgen can cause the growth of prostate cells. ADT lowers the amount of androgen made by the body. This may help stop the growth of tumor cells that need androgen to grow. Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors work by blocking the effects of androgen to stop the growth and spread of tumor cells. sXRT is a targeted radiation treatment for the prostate, typically given when cancer possibly returns after surgery or radiation. Its goal is to destroy any tumor cells in the area. Giving SBRT alone with watchful waiting may be as effective in treating prostate cancer as giving SBRT together with ARPI and ADT and sXRT may be effective in treating prostate cancer and preventing it from spreading elsewhere.

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, preliminary anti-tumor activity, and recommended dose of INR731 as a single agent and in combination with standard-of-care androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) in adult patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

This study is being done to answer the following question: can the chance of prostate cancer growing or spreading be lowered by adding a drug to the usual combination of drugs? This study would like to find out if this approach is better or worse than the usual approach for prostate cancer. The usual approach for patients who are not in a study is hormone treatment with Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) and Androgen-Receptor Pathway Inhibitor (ARPI).

This phase II trial studies how well prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) or fluciclovine positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) site-directed therapy works for treating patients with prostate cancer. PSMA or fluciclovine PET/CT may detect prostate cancer early and may help to show whether patients benefit from site directed treatment to PET detected abnormalities.

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of inavolisib plus enzalutamide compared with physician's choice of alternative androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPi) or docetaxel in biomarker-selected participants with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have received one prior second-generation ARPi.

The purpose of this phase Ib/II study is to (a) in Phase Ib evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of AMO959 when given in combination with lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan (also known as \[177Lu\]Lu-PSMA-617 or 177Lu-PSMA-617 and hereafter referred to as AAA617) with an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) in participants with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have failed one prior ARPI and with or without prior taxane exposure, and (b) in Phase II evaluate the preliminary efficacy of AMO959 in combination with AAA617 and ARPI in participants with mCRPC who have failed one prior ARPI, but who have not yet been exposed to taxane treatment.

The main objective of the trial is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of xaluritamig in combination with darolutamide or abiraterone.