Clinical Trials Radar

Solid tumours are abnormal lumps of tissue that can occur in different parts of the body. The tumours involved in this study have specific genetic characteristics that can make them more aggressive and challenging to treat. The study will test whether GSK5460025 alone or in combination (potential combinations may be included in future amendments to the protocol) with other anti-cancer agents can decrease tumor size, is safe, well-tolerated, and how the drug is processed in the body over time.

This study will evaluate the role of mass-based response testing (MRT) to select and deliver personalized hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) regimens to patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from high-grade appendiceal adenocarcinomas (HGAA) and colorectal cancer (CRC).

The overall goal of the randomized control trial (RCT) will be to evaluate the efficacy of modifications to a web-based tool for patient decision-making regarding return of genomic results that will more closely focus on rare cancers. Participants will be given access to a web-based decision aid (or a standard control) that guides participants in making decisions about what type of genomic results they would like to receive from testing performed in the PE-CGS study (NCT06340646).

Genetic testing is a type of test that detects changes to the genes-the DNA instructions that are passed on from the mother and father. The results of a genetic test can confirm whether the participant has a genetic disorder, which is a disease caused in whole or in part by changes to the genes. Genetic testing can also help determine a person's chance of getting or passing on a genetic disorder. Genetic tests use a sample of blood, hair, skin, or other tissue, and they can look at one gene or multiple genes at the same time. Genetic testing may change the options for treating people with certain types of cancer. For example, some medications are more helpful for the treatment of cancer in people with certain gene changes (mutations). The researchers are doing this study to develop new educational materials about genetic testing for people who speak different languages and have diverse cultural and educational backgrounds. During the study, the staff will interview participants with diverse cultural and educational backgrounds and ask them to review a sample of the educational materials that have been developed so far. Participants will give their opinions on these materials, and the researchers will use participants' feedback to improve the materials.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adebrelimab consolidation therapy after progression-free response of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer. This study plans to enroll patients with untreated limited-stage small cell lung cancer who meet the inclusion criteria. The eligible patients will be randomly divided 1:1 into two groups to receive treatment regimens for residual lymph nodes and involved irradiated areas. That is, carboplatin AUC 5, D1 + etoposide 100 mg/m…\^2 on days 1, 2, and 3 + thoracic radiotherapy (residual lymph nodes or involved irradiated areas), with each 3-week cycle. After 4 cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy, the non-progressing subjects will continue to receive adebrelimab (1200 mg, IV, Q3W) maintenance therapy.

A study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of α-PD-L1/4-1BB DLL3 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T (BHP01) in patients with Relapsed/Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) and determine the appropriate CAR-T cell dose. Next, In dose expansion phase, patients were assign two groups with/without bridge radiotherapy.

This is a phase 1/2 study of combined treatment with dupilumab (anti-IL-4Ra) and cemiplimab (anti-PD-1) in patients with early-stage, resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study will include participants with a confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC who are deemed to be surgical candidates, or patients who have a smoking history and radiographic findings highly suggestive if a diagnosis of NSCLC who are scheduled to undergo diagnostic biopsy. On Day 1, participants will receive neoadjuvant therapy consisting of 600 mg of dupilumab (2 SC injections of 300 mg) and 350 mg of IV cemiplimab. Participants will undergo standard of care surgery, which will be scheduled within 7 days of Day 15. Participants will be followed up 30 days following administration of dupilumab and cemiplimab for adverse event (AE) and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) monitoring. Participants will be offered adjuvant therapy as per standard of care, outside the context of this clinical treatment, and undergo subsequent standard of care monitoring for recurrence. The study team will monitor the status of the participant through chart review, or by telephone should the patient not continue to follow with a physician at Mount Sinai, for up to 5 years.

The study is to explore the the reasonable dosage and to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of HLX43 (Anti-PD-L1 ADC) in combination with Serplulimab (anti-PD-1 humanized monoclonal antibody injection) in patients with advanced lung cancer.

The purpose of the study is to see if our education materials help people at risk for Lynch syndrome decide about seeking genetic services. Untested relatives of patients with Lynch syndrome will be recruited to complete a baseline survey and will be randomized to receive either the an information letter or an information letter plus a booklet. Two follow-up surveys will be administered over the span of 6 months. Participants will also be invited to join an optional exit interview to provide feedback.

This phase I trial tests the safety, side effects, and best dose of ZEN003694 in combination with binimetinib in treating patients with solid tumors that carry RAS alterations and that have spread to other places in the body (advanced/metastatic) or cannot be removed by surgery (unresectable). ZEN003694 is an oral medication with potential anticancer activity. It is an inhibitor of a family of proteins called bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) which play important role during development and cellular growth. ZEN003694 may stop the growth of tumor cells that produce BET. Binimetinib is in a class of medications called kinase inhibitors. It works by blocking the action proteins called MEK1 and MEK2, that signal cancer cells to multiply. It may help keep cancer cells from growing and spreading. There is pre-clinical evidence that using ZEN003694 and binimetinib together may shrink or stabilize cancers studied in this trial. There are two parts of this study; dose escalation and dose expansion. In the dose escalation part of this study, different people will get different doses of the study drugs ZEN003694 and binimetinib. In the dose expansion part of this study, the highest dose with manageable side effects will be given to additional people. This will help to understand the side effects that may happen with this drug combination.

This phase II trial tests whether TRC102 (methoxyamine hydrochloride) in combination usual care treatment comprised of pemetrexed, cisplatin or carboplatin, and radiation therapy followed by durvalumab works better than the usual care treatment alone to shrink tumors in patients with stage III non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). TRC102 is in a class of drugs called antineoplastic agents. It blocks the ability of a cell to repair damage to its deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and may kill tumor cells. It may also help some anticancer drugs work better. Pemetrexed is in a class of medications called antifolate antineoplastic agents. It works by stopping cells from using folic acid to make DNA and may kill tumor cells. Cisplatin is in a class of medications known as platinum-containing compounds. It works by killing, stopping or slowing the growth of tumor cells. Carboplatin is in a class of medications known as platinum-containing compounds. It works in a way similar to the anticancer drug cisplatin, but may be better tolerated than cisplatin. Carboplatin works by killing, stopping or slowing the growth of tumor cells. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as durvalumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Radiation therapy uses high energy sources to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Giving TRC102 in combination with usual care treatment may be more effective than usual care treatment alone in stabilizing and lengthening survival time in patients with stage III non-squamous NSCLC.

The researchers are doing this study to test the ability of an animal biosensor platform (ABP) to detect NSCLC. Participants in this study will either be diagnosed with NSCLC, suspected to have NSCLC, or have not been diagnosed or suspected to have NSCLC. The ABP test uses laboratory animals that are trained to detect (by smell) different chemicals in urine. Studies show that people with lung cancer have unique chemicals in their urine that are not present in people without lung cancer, and researchers think these chemicals can be used to identify people with lung cancer without the need for invasive procedures (like biopsy).

This is a single-center, observational imaging study designed to evaluate the in vivo morphology of the male urethral internal sphincter ring using magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (MRI-DTI) fiber tracking and to investigate its relationship with prostate base morphology. Male participants undergoing clinically indicated pelvic, seminal vesicle, or prostate-related MRI-DTI examinations will be included. The study population may include patients with benign prostatic enlargement, younger men undergoing MRI for suspected cryptorchidism or suspected seminal vesiculitis, and patients with prostate cancer scheduled to receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). All participants will undergo T2-weighted imaging and DTI. T2WI-DTI image registration, dual-region-of-interest fiber tracking, and three-dimensional reconstruction will be used to visualize ring-like muscle fiber structures in the bladder neck, prostate base, and proximal urethral region. The cross-sectional imaging cohort will be used to assess the associations between prostate-side morphological parameters, including prostate volume, prostate base diameter or area, and intravesical prostatic protrusion, and sphincter-ring parameters, including ring inner diameter and ring area. The ADT paired cohort will undergo MRI-DTI before treatment and during follow-up after ADT to evaluate whether reduction in prostate volume and prostate base morphology is accompanied by corresponding changes in the urethral internal sphincter ring. This study will not alter the participants' existing clinical diagnostic or treatment pathways. Imaging data will be analyzed using standardized post-processing and quantitative measurement procedures. The results may provide in vivo imaging evidence for age- and prostate-related displacement and morphological remodeling of the male urethral internal sphincter and may inform future surgical strategies for identifying, preserving, or reconstructing proximal urinary continence-related structures.

This is a four-part study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a PSMA-directed radioantibody (rosopatamab tetraxetan, conjugated to either In-111 or Ac-225). Part 1 will consist of one administration of In-111-rosopatamab tetraxetan to characterize the biodistribution of the radioantibody to target organs and prostate cancer lesions. Participants then will be enrolled into either Part 2 (Dose Optimization) or Part 3 (Dose Escalation and Expansion) depending on their prior treatment history. Part 4 will be an extended regimen in dose escalation and expansion. Participants qualifying for Part 2 will be randomized to receive Ac-225 rosopatamab tetraxetan in a single fractionated cycle (dose administration on Day 1 and Day 15) at either 45 or 60 kBq/Kg. Participants qualifying for Part 3 must have received prior Lu-177-PSMA-radioligand therapy and will receive Ac-225 rosopatamab tetraxetan in a single fractionated cycle at 45, 55, or 60 kBq/Kg. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) will be monitored in Part 3 to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and the study may enroll additional participants to be treated with the RP2D dose level. Participants qualifying for Part 4 will initially receive two doses (dose administration on Day 1 and Day 15) at the dose level selected in Part 2, followed by a single third dose of Ac-225 rosopatamab tetraxetan administered approximately 12 weeks after completion of the Part 2 fractionated dosing regimen. The starting dose level for Part 4 will be 22 kBq/kg (or fixed activity equivalent). Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) will be monitored following administration of the third dose in Part 4 to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of a third dose of Ac-225 rosopatamab tetraxetan. Participants enrolled into any part will attend study visits which will include blood samples, electrocardiogram (ECG), radiographic imaging, and physical examinations along with other assessments.

This phase Ib trial tests the safety and side effects of ERAS-801 in treating patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplified or mutated grade IV glioblastoma or gliosarcoma that can be removed by surgery (resectable) and that is growing, spreading, or getting worse (progressive), that has come back after a period of improvement (recurrent) or that is newly diagnosed in an elderly patient. Glioblastoma is the most common brain cancer in adults and survival rates remain poor despite treatment including surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. EGFR is a protein found on the surface of some cells, to which epidermal growth factor binds, causing the cells to divide. It is found at abnormally high levels on the surface of many types of tumor cells, so these cells may divide excessively in the presence of epidermal growth factor. ERAS-801, an EGFR inhibitor that can penetrate the central nervous system, binds to the tumor cells that express EGFR and may help shrink or slow the growth of the tumor cells.

This phase II trial studies the effects of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and the timing of treatment with androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in treating patients with hormone sensitive prostate cancer that has spread from where it first started to other places in the body (metastatic), and that has come back after a period of improvement (recurrent). It also studies the effects of salvage radiation therapy (sXRT) on prostate cancer and to see if radiation to the pelvis helps prevent prostate cancer from spreading elsewhere. SBRT is a type of external radiation therapy that uses special equipment to position a patient and precisely deliver radiation to tumors in the body (except the brain). The total dose of radiation is divided into smaller doses given over several days. This type of radiation therapy helps spare normal tissue. Androgen can cause the growth of prostate cells. ADT lowers the amount of androgen made by the body. This may help stop the growth of tumor cells that need androgen to grow. Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors work by blocking the effects of androgen to stop the growth and spread of tumor cells. sXRT is a targeted radiation treatment for the prostate, typically given when cancer possibly returns after surgery or radiation. Its goal is to destroy any tumor cells in the area. Giving SBRT alone with watchful waiting may be as effective in treating prostate cancer as giving SBRT together with ARPI and ADT and sXRT may be effective in treating prostate cancer and preventing it from spreading elsewhere.

This trial studies whether a customized video intervention can help to reduce anxiety in brain cancer patients undergoing radiation treatment and their caregivers. A customized neuro-imaging referenced symptom video that describes symptoms and side effects specific to the patients' tumor may result in an early and sustained reduction in anxiety and distress during and after radiation treatment, thereby improving quality of life.

Participants who are experiencing abdominal pain due to having cancer in their pancreas may be eligible for this research study. For this type of pain, doctors often recommend radiation therapy to help with the pain. This radiation therapy is called stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Preparing for SBRT typically takes a week or longer. In this research study, doctors want to test a new workflow in order to shorten the time it takes for participants to receive SBRT to help with their pain. Doctors typically determine how to administer the SBRT by doing a simulation, which requires a CT (Computerized Tomography) scan. The CT scan is used to create a treatment plan. It can take time to schedule this CT scan and then it takes 5-10 days to create a treatment plan. A way to reduce the planning time for SBRT is to use the CT scan that participants had when their cancer was diagnosed to plan the SBRT. This new workflow can cut down the time it takes to schedule another CT scan and plan for and deliver SBRT. The workflow where doctors use a pre-existing CT scan is called CTsim-free treatment planning. CTsim-free treatment planning is what is being tested in this research study.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of BL-M05D1 in Subjects with Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors.

This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label phase III study to determine the efficacy and safety of intravesical SHR-1501 combined with Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) versus investigator-selected chemotherapy in patients with BCG-unresponsive papillary-only non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of Pumitamig alone or in combination with Ipilimumab or Cabozantinib in participants with advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)

This is a Phase 1, open-label, first-in-human study of CTX-10726 monotherapy in patients with metastatic or locally advanced malignancies. The study will be conducted in 2 Cohorts: Cohort 1 Dose Escalation and Cohort 2 Dose Expansion.

The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and tolerability of treatment with concurrent Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) and adaptive radiation therapy. The main objective is to establish the safety, tolerability, and feasibility of bladder preservation therapy treatment with concurrent SG and adaptive image-guided radiation therapy for participants with localized MIBC. Participants will receive the study drug, SG, through an IV once weekly on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day treatment cycle. The first cycle of SG will begin 21 days prior to the scheduled start of radiation therapy. The second and third cycles of SG will be given while the participant is receiving radiation therapy. Participants will be asked to undergo computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pre-and post-treatment. Participation in the research will last up to 5 years, depending on treatment outcomes, with a treatment period of 8 weeks and a study follow-up period of up to 2-5 years thereafter, and a survival follow-up, with only phone call communication from years 3-5.

Protocol Title: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study of Venetoclax Plus 3-Day Decitabine (DEC3-VEN) Versus Venetoclax Plus "2+6" DA Versus "3+7" DA Regimen in Adult Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Objective: This is a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase II trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of three induction regimens-Venetoclax plus 3-day Decitabine (DEC3-VEN), Venetoclax plus "2+6" DA, and standard "3+7" DA-in adult patients with newly diagnosed, intensifiable AML. Study Design: The study employs a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter design. A total of 291 eligible patients will be enrolled across approximately 10 centers in China and randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to the three treatment arms. Key Eligibility Criteria: Inclusion: Aged 16-65 with newly diagnosed non-APL AML (excluding favorable CBF-AML), eligible for intensive chemotherapy, ECOG ≤2, and adequate organ function. Exclusion: Prior AML treatment, secondary AML, active severe infection, significant cardiac comorbidity, or known hypersensitivity to the study drugs. Interventions: Induction: Arm A (VEN+"2+6"DA): Venetoclax (D1-8), Daunorubicin (D2-3), Cytarabine (D2-7). Arm B (DEC3-VEN): Venetoclax (D1-14), Decitabine (D4-6). FLT3/ITD+ patients add Sorafenib or Gilteritinib (D8-14). Arm C ("3+7"DA): Daunorubicin (D1-3), Cytarabine (D1-7). Consolidation (2 cycles): Arms A/B: Venetoclax + Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine. Arm C: High-Dose Cytarabine. Consolidation (Subsequent cycles): All arms receive multiple cycles of DA or HA regimens. Maintenance (6-8 cycles): Arms A/B: Venetoclax + Azacitidine. Arm C: Azacitidine. Main Outcome Measures: Primary Endpoint: Composite Complete Remission Rate (CR + CRi) after induction. Secondary Endpoints: Overall Survival (OS), CR rate, MRD-negative rate, Relapse-Free Survival (RFS), Event-Free Survival (EFS), and safety. Keywords: Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Venetoclax, Decitabine, Consolidation Therapy, Maintenance Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trial.

This phase II trial tests the safety, side effects, and how well combination chemotherapy with fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and idarubicin (FLAG-Ida) followed immediately by reduced-intensity total body radiation therapy, called total body irradiation (TBI), and donor hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) works in treating adults age 60 and older with newly diagnosed adverse-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or other high-grade myeloid cancer. Despite advances in supportive care and the approval of more than 10 new drugs since 2017, the outcomes of older adults with adverse-risk acute myeloid leukemia and other high-grade myeloid cancers remains poor. Most patients are expected to die from their cancer or the consequences of treatment-related side effects. Donor HCT is a very important part of any curative-cancer treatment for these patients. However, while accepted as standard care for decades, this treatment exposes patients to long periods of drug-induced low blood cell counts and the problems associated with low blood counts, like infections and bleeding, which are associated with significant risk of chronic side effects and death. This study will use a different approach to the upfront curative-cancer treatment of older adults with an adverse-risk AML or other high-grade myeloid cancer. This study will use intense chemotherapy followed a few days later by lower-dose TBI and donor HCT. Chemotherapy drugs, such as idarubicin, fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. G-CSF helps the bone marrow make more white blood cells in patients with low white blood cell count due to cancer treatment. This approach allows effective treatment of cancer cells and overall reduction of the period of low blood cells counts. This decreases the risk for problems associated with low blood counts, such as infection and chronic side effects. Decreasing these are important for older adults who undergo HCT. This treatment strategy may improve treatment outcomes by allowing more patients to successfully undergo donor HCT and reduce the risk of low blood cell counts and the problems associated with low blood counts. Giving chemotherapy followed immediately by reduced-intensity TBI and donor HCT may be safe, tolerable and/or effective in treating adults age 60 and older with newly diagnosed adverse-risk AML or other high-grade myeloid cancer.