Clinical Trials Radar

Optimal salvage treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer after trastuzumab and T-DM1 failure still remains to be established. We would like to investigate the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy of eribulin and trastuzumab as salvage treatment for HER2-Positive breast cancer after exposure to trastuzumab and T-DM1

This is a phase 1/1b, open-label, multicenter study consisting of sequential parts designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and effects pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, and antitumor activity of RGT-490, an investigational oral therapy, in adults with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors including breast cancer. Participants enrolled in the study have advanced disease that is not amendable to curative treatment and whose tumors harbor alterations in the PI3KCA gene.

This is an open-label, multicenter Phase II clinical study conducted in subjects with advanced breast cancer.

Accurate evaluation of tumor boundaries in breast-conserving surgery is closely associated with reducing the second operation of patients. Meanwhile, accurately assessing sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis is crucial for determining the extent of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and minimizing complications. Near-infrared-II (NIR-II) fluorescence imaging using molecular agents has shown promise for in situ imaging during resection. However, very effective probes can be applied to clinical trials up to now, which limits the clinical application of fluorescence imaging. Here we developed a new technology that can quickly differentiation between cancer and para-cancer tissue as well as metastatic and normal sentinel lymph nodes(SLN). In brief, the fresh tissues were incubated with the probe immediately after intraoperative resection and imaged to identify the tumor area and distinguish the metastatic status of SLN. The accuracy of fluorescence imaging was confirmed by pathological diagnosis.

This study aims to fill the current gap in data regarding HR+/HER2- ABC 1L treatment patterns and outcomes in the real-world setting in China, especially in the context of the widespread application of CDK4/6is and the lack of sufficient evidence for ribociclib as a most recently marketed drug in the real-world setting.

According to the standard treatment guidelines established until recently, in the case of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence without systemic metastasis, salvage mastectomy or lumpectomy can be performed when either partial or whole breast radiation therapy is possible. On the other hand, there are currently no standard treatment guidelines for axillary treatment, and the evidence for this is limited. Axillary lymph node metastasis was reported to occur in about 26% of breast cancer patients who had negative sentinel lymph nodes from previous surgery for primary breast cancer and only local recurrence occurred. It is still important in the decision of treatment or adjuvant radiation therapy. However, it is known that most of the patients with ipsilateral breast recurrence do not have axillary lymph node metastasis. Therefore, performing axillary axillary surgery in all of these patients does not help the patient's survival in many cases, but rather can lead to complications such as lymphedema and seroma and postoperative wound infection. A question about the implementation of axillary lymph node resection has been raised and for this reason, it is necessary to study whether surveillance lymph node biopsy is still effective in patients with recurrence in the ipsilateral breast. Most of the studies on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence without systemic metastasis reported to date are case reports or small retrospective studies. In addition, the combined meta-analysis also has limitations in that the study design is not uniform, and there are many cases in which primary breast cancer surgery performed total mastectomy or axillary lymph node dissection. This study is a multicenter prospective study designed to validate the clinical effectiveness of repeat-SLNB conducted in patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence among patients who previously underwent breast conservation and sentinel lymph node biopsy for unilateral primary breast cancer.

This is a hybrid decentralized, single-arm, interventional study designed to evaluate the impact of precision medicine navigation and reflexive expert review of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with stage IV solid tumor malignancies (breast, lung, colorectal, and bladder cancers). The purpose of this study is to investigate whether intervention from a centralized precision oncology navigator and expert review of NGS results by the precision oncology pharmacist will increase ordering of Level 1/2 genome informed therapy (GIT) compared to an estimated historical rate of 15%. Secondary endpoints will assess the impact of a centralized precision oncology navigator and expert review of NGS results on enrollment in biomarker-directed clinical trials and overall survival at 2 years after return of NGS results. The study will take approximately 12 months for enrolment and 2 years of follow-up after the date of NGS results.

The aim of the study is to find out whether supervised physical exercise during cancer drug treatment improves the effectiveness of the treatment in metastasized breast, kidney, ovarian and prostate cancer compared to unsupervised exercise. In addition, the investigators are investigating whether the use of atorvastatin combined with guided group exercise training would further improve the response to cancer treatment.

The purpose of this study is to learn if certain drug combinations are effective treatments for patients with advanced ER+/HER2- who have previously been treated with palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib.

This multi-site study is being conducted to examine dietary and activity patterns, body composition, blood and quality of life in breast cancer patients. The study will recruit 176 women with MBC in Milwaukee (n=88) and Chicago (n=88).

A Phase I/II, Open-label study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, and antitumor efficacy of FWD1802 monotherapy in patients with ER+/HER2- unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. This clinical trial aims to explore the role of FWD1802 in the ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patient population. The primary objectives are to address the following questions: Phase I Study: Determine the Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D) and/or Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of FWD1802 in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Phase II Study: To evaluate the efficacy of FWD1802 at the RP2D in patients with ESR1-mutated ER-positive/HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, using objective response rate (ORR) as the efficacy endpoint.

This phase II trial tests how well propranolol and pembrolizumab work to cause tumor re-sensitization and therefore treatment in patients with triple negative breast cancer that has not responded to previous checkpoint inhibitor therapy (refractory), cannot be removed by surgery (unresectable) or has spread from where it first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic). Propranolol is a drug that is classified as a beta-blocker. Beta-blockers affect the heart and circulation. Beta-blockers, like propranolol, may help to counteract effects of certain stress hormones produced by the body during cancer treatment and may increase the effectiveness of the pembrolizumab. Pembrolizumab is a drug that is classified as an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Propranolol may be able to re-sensitize the cells of the immune system to respond to the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with checkpoint inhibitor refractory metastatic or unresectable triple negative breast cancer.

The goal of this observational study is to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) model for predicting the risk of distant metastasis in patients with primary breast cancer. The main question it aims to answer is: Can a multimodal AI model, trained on routinely available histopathological images, accurately predict the long-term risk of breast cancer metastasis? Researchers will analyze existing hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) stained tissue slides from patients who underwent surgery between 2015 and 2025. Clinical data will be used to train the AI model and evaluate its performance in predicting metastasis.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and therapeutic activity of GI-102 as a single agent and in combination with conventional anti-cancer drugs, pembrolizumab or trastuzumab deruxtecan(T-DXd) over a range of advanced and/or metastatic solid tumors.

This trial is a pilot, prospective, single-center study conducted in a population of patients with metastatic breast cancer (whatever the immunohistochemical subtype) or metastatic prostate cancer. The aim of this exploratory study is to compare the sensitivity of three different techniques (CellSearch®, Parsortix® and SmartCatch®) in detecting circulating tumor cells (CTCs). After the patient's agreement, and before starting anti-tumor treatment, a blood sample will be taken using the 3 different CTC detection techniques. Each patient will participate in the study for one day. A total of 54 evaluable patients (36 patients with metastatic breast cancer and 18 patients with metastatic prostate cancer) will be included in this interventional study.

This is a multicenter, open phase Ib/II clinical study, which is divided into two phases: dose exploration and efficacy expansion. Participants entering the study will receive HRS-8080 combined with Dalpiciclib Isethionate Tablets therapy.

Liquid biopsy is a noninvasive method for detecting and quantifying circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Thanks to ScreenCell technology, this study aims to evaluate the evolution of the number of CTCs during breast cancer follow-up. The identification and characterization of CTCs would make it possible to obtain information on the stage and molecular characteristics of cancer during follow-up

This study is designed to evaluate AZD8421 alone and in combination with selected targeted anti-cancer drugs in patients with ER+HER2- advanced breast cancer, and patients with metastatic high-grade serious ovarian cancer.

This study is designed to compare the safety and efficacy of JSKN003 versus T-DM1 in unrespectable locally advanced and/or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer participants previously treated with trastuzumab and taxane.

The objective of this non-interventional study (NIS) is to evaluate prevalence of ESR1 mutation after endocrine therapy in the palliative setting, quality of life, tolerability, and safety and to describe treatment detail and adverse event (AE) management in postmenopausal women with locally advanced and/or metastatic ER+ HER2- ESR1-mutated breast cancer and second line treatment with elacestrant according to SmPC (Summary of product characteristics) in a real-world setting.

The study is being conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy of HLX22 in combination with HLX87 as first-line treatment in patients with HER2-positive recurrent or metastatic breast cancer

Several studies have shown improved sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT compared with conventional imaging for diagnosing metastatic breast cancer in retrospective and smaller prospective studies. For response monitoring, we expect FDG-PET/CT to detect disease progression earlier than CT in patients treated for metastatic breast cancer, enabling earlier start of second-line therapies. Current knowledge about the potential benefit of FDG-PET/CT for response monitoring of patients with metastatic breast cancer comes from observational studies. Consequently, current evidence is only hypothesis-generating and prospective, randomized trials such as the MONITOR-RCT are needed to corroborate these findings. The MONITOR-RCT clinical trial aims to investigate whether monitoring with FDG-PET/CT can improve survival in patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer. It is a parallel group comparative randomized trial comparing an experimental monitoring strategy based on FDG-PET/CT with a standard monitoring strategy based on CT. Participating patients should have newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer and be considered eligible for initiating first-line medical treatment and subsequent regular response monitoring. A total of 420 patients will be included in the study, with recruitment taking place across 11 participating hospital sites in Denmark, Germany, and Italy. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Can monitoring with FDG-PET/CT compared to conventional CT prolong the overall survival of MBC patients? * Is this-as expected-due to earlier detection of disease progression and earlier initiation of second-line therapies? * Is this accompanied by less need for additional diagnostics, less need for hospitalization, and improved quality of life? Participants will: * Undergo FDG-PET/CT scans at scheduled intervals to monitor disease progression. * Be given standard treatments as part of oncological care, which is informed by the FDG-PET/CT scans * Fill out questionnaires about their quality of life at various time points throughout the study. Objectives are: Primary: To demonstrate superiority in overall survival of response monitoring with FDG-PET/CT in patients with metastatic breast cancer over response monitoring based on CT. Appropriately adapted PERCIST criteria for FDG-PET/CT and the RECIST1.1 criteria for CT will be used. Secondary: To demonstrate superiority in quality of life and exposure to oncologic treatment with FDG-PET/CT and to investigate the cost-effectiveness.

This Phase III trial adopts a randomized, open label, positive drug control, and multicenter trial design. Subjects who meet the criteria are randomly divided into 1:1 groups and receive treatment with TQB2102 injection or docetaxel combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab, respectively.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Trastuzumab Rezetecan (SHR-A1811) is safe and tolerable for patients with HER2-Low unresectable/metastatic breast cancer complicated with visceral crisis. Participants will take Trastuzumab Rezetecan every three weeks, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.

The goal of the Dose Escalation phase of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary anti-tumor activity to determine the preliminary recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of NKT3964 in adults with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. The goal of the Expansion phase of the study is to evaluate the preliminary anti-tumor activity of NKT3964 at the RDE based on objective response rate (ORR) and determine the preliminary recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D).