Clinical Trials Radar

The purpose of this research is to study the effects and safety of alternating neoadjuvant chemotherapy on borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy (SPGJ) more effectively reduces postoperative delayed gastric emptying (DGE) compared to conventional gastrojejunostomy (CGJ) in patients with unresectable stage IV gastric cancer accompanied by malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO). This multicenter randomized trial aims to establish a new surgical standard that enhances recovery and quality of life in advanced gastric cancer. The main questions are: 1. Does SPGJ significantly decrease DGE compared with CGJ? 2. Does SPGJ enable faster food tolerance, shorter hospital stay, and earlier chemotherapy? Researchers will compare two arms - SPGJ and CGJ - to determine differences in postoperative gastric emptying, hospital course, complications, and survival outcomes. Participants Eligible participants are adults aged 20-85 years with histologically proven unresectable gastric adenocarcinoma limited to the lower third of the stomach and endoscopic or radiologic evidence of obstruction. Patients with total bowel obstruction, middle-third tumor extension, emergency conditions, or severe malnutrition (albumin \< 2.5 g/L) are excluded. Interventions * CGJ arm: Standard laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy using a 60 mm stapler without partitioning. * SPGJ arm: Laparoscopic transverse gastric partitioning 5 cm proximal to the tumor with a 2 cm bridge at the lesser curvature, followed by stapled gastrojejunostomy. All operations follow standardized training videos and pretrial workshops to ensure consistency across 32 Korean university hospitals. Study Design This is a prospective, randomized controlled multicenter trial (KLASS 16). After intraoperative diagnostic laparoscopy confirms eligibility, participants are randomized by a secure web-based block system stratified by hospital. A total of 144 patients (72 per arm) will be enrolled, ensuring 90% statistical power based on expected DGE rates (CGJ 34.6% vs SPGJ 3.8%). Endpoints * Primary endpoint: Incidence of DGE within 30 days (ISGPS criteria). * Secondary endpoints: Day of oral tolerance (GOO score ≥ 2), hospital stay, Clavien-Dindo ≥ II complications, mechanical obstruction recurrence, 6 and 12 month overall survival, and quality of life. Data Collection and Analysis Data will include postoperative nutrition recovery, complication grades, and survival follow-up. Analyses will utilize Chi square or Fisher's exact test for DGE rates and Kaplan-Meier with log rank testing for survival. Logistic regression will identify DGE risk factors. Duration Total 3 years: 6 months preparation, 1 year enrollment, 1 year follow up, and 6 months for data analysis and reporting. Expected Outcomes SPGJ is expected to reduce DGE by \> 70%, shorten hospital stay by \~3 days, and enable earlier chemotherapy, thereby improving palliative care outcomes and overall patient quality of life. The KLASS 16 trial will provide the first multicenter, Level I evidence to determine whether SPGJ should replace CGJ as the standard palliative procedure for MGOO.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether treating glioblastoma patients with sitagliptin can improve immune response against the tumor by targeting specific immune cells called myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) that suppress your body's natural immune response against cancer. Sitagliptin is an investigational drug for this condition that works by inhibiting an enzyme called dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4), which MDSCs rely on to enter the brain and function. While sitagliptin is FDA-approved for diabetes treatment, its use in glioblastoma is investigational (experimental).

This research study is for Glioblastoma (GBM) patients who will be beginning Optune as part of their clinical care, which is a novel treatment that utilizes - tumor treating fields (TTFields), (aka, electrical therapy), which has shown to improve overall survival in large multi-center trials. As a part of this study, participants will either receive Optune with "standard array mapping" (based on regular contrast enhanced MRI) or an "alternative (more precise) array mapping" based on sophisticated state of the art MRI techniques including "whole brain spectroscopy". Whole brain MRI spectroscopy provides additional metabolic information to map out the full extent of tumor spreading within the brain (far beyond from what is seen on regular MRI), by identifying certain metabolites that are present in cancer cells versus healthy tissue. This study is being performed to show whether alternative array mapping improves treatment outcomes, as opposed to the standard array mapping, by maximizing delivery of TTFields dose, thereby achieving more effective tumor cell killing, decreasing the rate of local recurrence, and improving the overall survival as well as quality of life measures.

This study focuses on patients with H. pylori-positive resectable locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the gastric and oesophagogastric junction. It evaluates the perioperative oxaliplatin with S-1 (SOX) combined H. pylori eradication versus oxaliplatin with S-1 in the management of H. pylori-positive locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the gastric and oesophagogastric junction (cT3/4a Nx or T2 N2/3, M0) , assessing their values and advantages.

This study collects and studies tissue and blood samples from patients with prostate or bladder/urothelial cancer that has recurred (come back) at or near the same place as the original (primary) tumor or has spread to other parts of the body. Studying samples of blood and tissue samples from patients with prostate or bladder/urothelial cancer in the laboratory may help doctors learn more about new biomarkers, potential drug targets, and resistance developing in response to treatment. It may also help doctors find better ways to treat the cancer.

Phase Ia, an open-label, sequential, dose escalation study to evaluate the tolerability and safety of JL19001 Injection alone in subjects with high risk NMIBC. The investigators plan to test 3 dose levels, 100, 200, and 400 μg in the Phase Ia study. A traditional 3 + 3 dose escalation design will be used. Eligible subjects will be sequentially enrolled and will be observed for DLT(s) during the DLT monitoring period (Day 1 \~ 21).

This pilot feasibility clinical trial is evaluating a novel treatment strategy for patients with advanced bladder cancer that is unresectable, has spread to nearby lymph nodes or a limited number of distant sites (oligometastatic disease), and has responded to initial treatment with enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab. Although this combination has significantly improved outcomes compared to traditional chemotherapy, many patients are left with residual cancer in the bladder or other sites, and there is currently no established standard approach for managing this remaining disease or determining the optimal duration of systemic therapy. Prolonged treatment can lead to cumulative side effects and negatively impact quality of life. This study investigates whether adding consolidative treatment-such as radiation therapy to the bladder and metastatic sites or surgical removal of the bladder (radical cystectomy)-can safely eliminate residual disease and delay cancer progression. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to precisely target and destroy cancer cells while minimizing exposure to surrounding normal tissues. In selected patients, surgery may be used to remove remaining tumor in the bladder. Targeted radiation techniques, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), may also be used to treat small metastatic sites. This approach may allow for safe discontinuation of systemic therapy, potentially reducing long-term treatment-related side effects. A key component of this trial is the integration of biomarker testing using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from blood and urine tumor DNA (utDNA). These tests detect small amounts of tumor-derived genetic material and may help identify patients most likely to benefit from consolidative treatment, as well as guide decisions about ongoing therapy. By combining response to systemic therapy with personalized local treatment and biomarker-driven monitoring, this study aims to improve cancer control, reduce complications from untreated local disease, and inform future treatment strategies for patients with advanced bladder cancer.

MIBC-PET is a prospective, monocentric, no-profit study with paired imaging comparison enrolling 60 patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed high-grade MIBC. All patients undergo baseline staging with \[18F\]FDG PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) of chest, abdomen, and pelvis. A second \[18F\]FDG PET/CT and CT are performed after two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. \[18F\]FDG PET/CT includes both standard delayed imaging and an early dynamic pelvic acquisition to overcome urinary tracer interference. The primary endpoints are (1) diagnostic accuracy of \[18F\]FDG PET/CT versus ceCT for baseline staging, and (2) accuracy of \[18F\]FDG PET/CT in predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints include validation of early dynamic \[18F\]FDG PET/CT for local staging and radiomic/AI-based predictive modeling.

This is a Phase II, single cohort study designed to evaluate outcomes in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with variant histology who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with or without immunotherapy (IO) followed by trimodal therapy (TMT). Enrolled patients will undergo at least 3 cycles of NAC +/- IO (oncologist's choice) followed by a four- or six-week course of concurrent standard of care chemotherapy and radiation therapy. These patients will be compared with historical controls of patients with a diagnosis of pure urothelial carcinoma who have undergone TMT. This study has been designed to test the hypothesis that variant histology TMT can be delivered within 45 days of NAC +/- IO and is therefore a viable option in patients who are risk of systemic disease spread.

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if a partial cystectomy with extended pelvic lymph node removal will be effective at treating Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer instead of a complete cystectomy with extended pelvic lymph node removal. This clinical trial aims to determine the safety and oncologic efficacy of the intervention, and to examine patient-reported quality of life outcomes in participants. Participants will receive the standard pre-surgery treatment for approximately 4 to 6 weeks. After the pre-surgery treatment is completed, participants will undergo a partial cystectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection. After surgery, participants will receive adjuvant systemic therapy.

This clinical study evaluated the tolerability, safety and preliminary efficacy of T3011 in subjects with advanced melanoma.

This study evaluates the combination of the autophagy inhibitor hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), the MEK inhibitor tunlametinib, and the anti-PD-1 antibody pucotenlimab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma. The primary objectives are to assess the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives include evaluating adverse events (type, severity, and incidence), duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS), as well as exploring the molecular mechanisms by which autophagy modulation enhances immunogenicity in mutant melanoma. Further exploratory analyses will examine the mechanisms by which autophagy inhibition enhances tumor sensitivity to PD-1 blockade, thereby establishing experimental and theoretical grounds for refining future clinical approaches.

This phase I trial tests the safety, side effects, and best dose of FH-FOLR1 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in treating pediatric patients with FOLR1+ acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that has come back after a period of improvement (recurrent) or has not responded to previous treatment (refractory). CAR T-cell therapy is a type of treatment in which a patient's T cells (a type of immune system cell) are changed in the laboratory so they will attack cancer cells. T cells are taken from a patient's blood. Then the gene for a special receptor that binds to a FOLR1 on the patient's cancer cells is added to the T cells in the laboratory. The special receptor is called a chimeric antigen receptor. Large numbers of the CAR T cells are grown in the laboratory and given to the patient by infusion for treatment of certain cancers. Chemotherapy drugs, such as fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, are given to a patient before the manufactured FH-FOLR1 CAR T cells are infused back into the patient to assist in the CAR T cell activity in the patient. The trial is evaluating if giving FH-FOLR1 CAR T cell therapy is safe and tolerable for pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory AML.

This study is being done to better understand patient experiences with using a mobile application, known as Vigilant, to monitor symptoms as outpatients and to gather preliminary data on the potential clinical benefit to remote monitoring of adverse events.

This is a Phase 1/2, first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalating trial designed to assess the safety and efficacy of VNX-101 in patients with relapsed or refractory CD19-positive hematologic malignancies.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of a venetoclax-based consolidation therapy versus conventional consolidation chemotherapy in newly diagnosed adult patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) after induction therapy with venetoclax and azacitidine and are planned for transplantation. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does consolidation therapy with a venetoclax-containing regimen lead to superior clinical outcomes compared to conventional chemotherapy in this specific patient population? What is the comparative safety profile of the venetoclax-containing consolidation regimen versus conventional chemotherapy in these patients? Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the venetoclax-based consolidation therapy or the conventional consolidation chemotherapy before undergoing transplantation.

This clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of venetoclax-based consolidation therapy versus conventional consolidation chemotherapy (intermediate/high-dose cytarabine) in newly diagnosed adult patients with intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Participants must have achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) after induction therapy with venetoclax and azacitidine and are planned to undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

The SCORE-NHL study is a prospective, multi-center, study designed to collect data and biological samples from participants diagnosed with aggressive Stage I to IV non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL). Study participants will undergo research blood collections of up to 60 mL as well as residual tissue collection, collected as part of a standard of care procedure, for use in research. Collected samples and data will be analyzed to evaluate biomarkers associated with development and validation of cancer monitoring and detection assays ("Natera cancer monitoring and detection test(s)").

This is a phase 1, open-label, dose-finding study to assess the safety, feasibility, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of autologous base edited anti-CD45 CAR T cells (referred to as "CART-45 cells") following an autologous transplant of CD45 base edited hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (referred to as "CD45BE-HSPC") in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies.

The primary objective of this study is to determine safety and tolerability of Karonudib for the treatment of hematological malignancies. Secondary objectives are to determine a recommended RP2D and schedule for further development of Karonudib, to determine the pharmacokinetics of Karonudib, to look for evidence of treatment efficacy. Overall survival will also be recorded.

The T-RRex study evaluates the efficacy of WU-CART-007 for patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL)/Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LBL) and to WU-CART-007 as a therapy to induce complete Minimum Residual Disease (MRD) negative response

The purpose of this study is to collect voice recordings and nervous system (neurologic) assessments from people with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or multiple myeloma (MM) who are receiving standard treatment with CAR T-cell therapy. Researchers will study whether these voice recordings and assessments are a practical (feasible) way to monitor for immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Feasibility will be measured by tracking how many participants join the study and complete the assessments.

Despite the progress in the therapy, Hodgkin's Lymphoma (HL) remains fatal for more than 15% of patients. Even in patients who are cured, the morbidity of therapy is substantial and long-lasting. New therapeutic agents are required therefore not only to further reduce mortality but also to alleviate morbidity. The majority of HL express the CD30 antigens. CD30 expression is routinely used for the diagnosis of HL. Preclinical observations support CD30 as a viable target of CAR-T therapy. This phase Ib/II study was conducted based on these observations. The purpose of this study is to determine the tolerability of ATLCAR.CD30.CCR4 cells in subjects with Hodgkin's Lymphoma and identify a recommended dose for further. This is a single-center, open-label phase Ib/II trial that uses a 3+3 design to identify a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ATLCAR.CD30.CCR4 cells in Hodgkin's Lymphoma. The phase II portion is designed to determine the PFS of ATLCAR.CD30.CCR4 in Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Subjects will be enrolled on 1 of 3 dose levels as determined by a 3+3 design. Up to 25 evaluable subjects may then be enrolled in the phase II portion of the study. Subjects may have cells procured to manufacture the ATLCAR.CD30.CCR4 cells if they meet eligibility for procurement. During the time period necessary to manufacture the ATLCAR.CD30.CCR4 cells, Subjects will be allowed to receive standard-of-care bridging therapy at the discretion of their local oncologist. Prior to cell infusion, subjects will undergo additional eligibility evaluations, and then if eligible, will undergo lymphodepletion followed by cell infusion 2-14 days later. Subjects will then be followed for 15 years as is required for studies involving gene transfer experiments.

This multicenter translational study, with prospective and retrospective samples, aims to identify new strategies to selectively eliminate neoplastic T cells by modulating intracellular ROS levels. Interactions between drugs capable of activating the apoptotic process (e.g., Venetoclax) and drugs capable of altering ROS homeostasis (e.g., inhibitors of the enzyme glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase) will be examined. The most promising compounds will be selected based on results obtained in vitro on cell lines and PDX already available in the laboratory, and then will be assayed ex vivo in cells obtained from patients with resistant/refractory T-cell neoplasms.